[Southampton-pm] The reason my Plack demo failed. :)

[Duncan Garland]

Hi Tim,

 

I spend a lot of my time working on a Catalyst which was originally version 5.8 but is now 5.9. I think that means we’re using Plack under the hood somewhere without realising it.

 

For that reason I’m interested in learning about Plack and its middleware but I haven’t any plans to do any active investigation at the moment.

 

All the best.

 

Duncan

From: Southampton-pm [mailto:southampton-pm-bounces+duncan.garland=ntlworld.com at pm.org] On Behalf Of Tim Retout
Sent: 13 September 2012 21:43
To: southampton-pm at pm.org
Subject: [Southampton-pm] The reason my Plack demo failed. :)

 

For those who missed it, last week I gave an impromptu demonstration of Plack - I'm trying to find a good way to migrate ModPerl::Registry scripts over to something "modern".  However, I couldn't get the nice StackTrace middleware to show up when I added "die" into my example.

 

As a follow-up, I filed this issue on github, and got a very speedy response from the author:

 

https://github.com/plack/Plack/issues/326

 

So I was able to produce a customised version of Plack::App::Cascade that does support the StackTrace middleware.  I'm still thinking through all the issues around a full migration path from ModPerl::Registry, however.  Is anyone else out there interested in this stuff?


 

-- 
Tim Retout <tim at retout.co.uk>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/southampton-pm/attachments/20120922/7717f087/attachment.html>