[Melbourne-pm] Apache Cache
lists at holsman.net
Mon Jul 3 19:34:50 PDT 2006
what about using memcached ?
i'm guessing thumbnails are about 40-50k each.. you could just stick
the things in memecache and let it cache a couple of thousand that way.
I wouldn't use the CPAN module though, there are 2 others which are
being used at the moment.
there is a discussion about the Perl Client here: http://
lists.danga.com/pipermail/memcached/2006-June/ and http://
On 04/07/2006, at 12:18 PM, Scott Penrose wrote:
> Hey Dudes
> I need to cache some thumbnails in a mod perl Apache module.
> The way that most systems seem to do it on CPAN is to use a "."
> directory in the same location, or some other top root directory via
> However it occurs to me with Cache::Cache, and other cache systems -
> and things like Apache::Cache, and lots of cache abilities built into
> top level apache etc etc - that there might be a better way.
> Unfortunately Apache::Cache is a shared memory cache for memory
> between calls - which is not really much help for thumbnails (too
> much data). I could just do a directory cache, but then if someone
> wanted to move to Memcached (for example) that might make it harder.
> Anyone any experience in this?
> Ta dudes
> * - * http://www.osdc.com.au - Open Source Developers Conference *
> - *
> Scott Penrose
> Open source developer
> scottp at dd.com.au
> Dismaimer: Open sauce usually ends up never coming out (of the
> Please do not send me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
> See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html
> Microsoft is not the answer. It's the question. And the answer is no.
> Melbourne-pm mailing list
> Melbourne-pm at pm.org
More information about the Melbourne-pm