SPUG: Simplest tool for creating custom modules?
Creede Lambard
creede at penguinsinthenight.com
Sat Jan 22 17:42:43 PST 2005
Unfortunately once you get outside the realm of Exporter you've probably
pretty well stepped away from the idea of "minimal Perl."
I would guess that anything that doesn't come standard with Perl, you
shouldn't get into*.
*Except in a chapter on CPAN, of course.
I used to use one of the techniques in Damian's OO book
On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 07:24:10PM -0800, Tim Maher wrote:
> Friends in Perlity,
>
> I'm writing the section for my book on "Creating your own
> modules", and I'm wondering if I should base the discussion on
> Exporter.pm, or show the reader one of the more modern tools
> (esp. if there's one that's becoming accepted as a "new standard").
>
> The advantage of the Exporter.pm approach is that it's quite
> simple and I already know how it works 8-}, but if my readers
> would be better off hearing about something newer and shinier
> that's also simple and won't ostracize them from other JAPHs, I'm
> open to alternatives.
>
--
===================================================================
* .~. ( : Creede Lambard :
Never rush a miracle man. . / V \ . :------------------------:
You get lousy miracles. /( )\ : creede at :
--------------------------------^^-^^----: penguinsinthenight :
Linux. Reliable and free. Pick any two. : dot com :
===================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/spug-list/attachments/20050122/d8e30ed0/attachment.bin
More information about the spug-list
mailing list