[tpm] CGI.pm or not?

[Fulko Hew]

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <arocker at vex.net> wrote:

>
> If nobody's interested in discussing regex weirdness on Thursday, how
> about CGI? There's a suggestion that CGI.pm might be dropped from the core
> modules.
>
> Is anyone still using CGI for controlling web sites, or has everyone moved
> on?
> If so, to what?
>

Like Stuart, I don't have the time to come up with my 'regex toe stubbers'
for this month
but I'm willing to discuss CGI, and listen to FastCGI.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/toronto-pm/attachments/20130527/eee014b6/attachment.html>