[tpm] CGI.pm or not?

[Stuart Watt]

I can chip in a quick bit on FastCGI if useful. Don't have time (this month) to prepare a full bit, but I could do that.

--S


On 2013-05-27, at 3:07 PM, Tom Legrady wrote:

> Mojolicious, Catalyst, Dancer, CAF, .....
> 
> 
> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 2:57 PM, <arocker at vex.net> wrote:
> 
> If nobody's interested in discussing regex weirdness on Thursday, how
> about CGI? There's a suggestion that CGI.pm might be dropped from the core
> modules.
> 
> Is anyone still using CGI for controlling web sites, or has everyone moved
> on?
> If so, to what?
> 
> _______________________________________________
> toronto-pm mailing list
> toronto-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/toronto-pm
> 
> _______________________________________________
> toronto-pm mailing list
> toronto-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/toronto-pm

--
Stuart Watt
stuart at morungos.com / twitter.com/morungos


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/toronto-pm/attachments/20130527/90330f19/attachment.html>