[tpm] Follow-up on Feb 2012 Testing Talk
Olaf Alders
olaf at vilerichard.com
Sat Mar 3 19:17:08 PST 2012
On 2012-03-03, at 10:13 AM, Rob Janes wrote:
> ## this tests the useability of the package
>
> BEGIN {
> use_ok('Compress::Bzip2');
> };
I've got use_ok() and require_ok() all over a lot of my tests, but I recently moved away from that to new_ok() after finding out that it exists. Also, there is some discussion as to the usefulness of require_ok(), because of subtle problems it can introduce. Here's a helpful comment from Ovid about avoiding use_ok() and require_ok():
http://www.dagolden.com/index.php/1322/five-testmore-features-you-might-not-be-using-yet/#comment-6218
Also, I should note that the entire blog post is well worth reading. This is where I was made aware of new_ok().
Best,
Olaf
--
Olaf Alders
olaf at vilerichard.com
http://vilerichard.com -- folk rock
http://twitter.com/vilerichard
http://cdbaby.com/cd/vilerichard
More information about the toronto-pm
mailing list