SPUG: Unidentified Flying Objects
Jeff Almeida
spud at spudzeppelin.com
Tue Jan 10 13:07:01 PST 2006
On Jan 10, 2006, at 2:25 PM, Andrew Sweger wrote:
> Somehow it seems to defeat the purpose of the academic OO model. But
> that's just because I can't think of a practical example of where this
> technique would actually be helpful to understanding the solution to a
> problem.
Think about the classic textbook example for multiple inheritance: a
flying boat
is both a boat and an airplane. But really, it doesn't act like both
of them at the
same time... this way, it's a boat when it's a boat and it's and
airplane when it's
an airplane.
Or, as a second suggestion, certain professional athletes might have
two (or
more!) sets of statistics, based on which sport they happened to be
playing at
the time: Bo Jackson, Deion Sanders, Michael Jordan, and Danny Ainge all
leap to mind right away....
My main question is how you keep track of whether an object can
change its
base class -- do you add some attribute common to a superclass that
includes
all of the possible classes something could become, itemizing which
ones it may
become? Or, is this whole proposition just a loosely-camouflaged
form of
multiple inheritance that reorders the inheritance hierarchy on the fly?
And how in the world did you get warmer weather today than we did?
*grin*
****************************************
Jeff D. Almeida * Corinth, TX
spud at spudzeppelin.com
****************************************
More information about the spug-list
mailing list