[sf-perl] perl on a mac ...

Matthew Lanier matt at lanier.org
Thu Nov 20 08:01:31 PST 2008


On Thu, 20 Nov 2008, Darin Fisher wrote:

> Thanks Joe.  A much better argument than mine.
>
> But I just can't help myself...
>
> Rich,
>
> The wrong forum!

<list moderator speaking>

actually, no, this is a fine forum for such divergences.  divergences on 
or about the topic of perl, what it lacks, and why it lacks it are fine 
here.

</list moderator speaking>

m@

>
> (and thank you for distracting from my divergence off this topic :) )
>
> But FYI (just do a simple search), there has been and still is, a huge and obviously successful effort to keep PERL in the forefront of available and relevant tools.
>
> -Darin
>
> Not a shred of evidence exists in favor of the idea that life is serious.
> - Brendan Gill
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Joe Brenner <doom at kzsu.stanford.edu>
> To: San Francisco Perl Mongers User Group <sanfrancisco-pm at pm.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 11:39:40 PM
> Subject: Re: [sf-perl] perl on a mac ...
>
>
> Rich Morin <rdm at cfcl.com> wrote:
>
>> <snark>
>> Isn't it about time somebody created something like irb (the
>> interactive ruby interpreter) for Perl?  Sorry, I forgot; the
>> developers are all busy (re-)designing Perl 6...
>> </snark>
>
> What would an irb get you that the perldb doesn't?
>
> _______________________________________________
> SanFrancisco-pm mailing list
> SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/sanfrancisco-pm
>

-- 

Matthew D. P. K. Strelchun-Lanier
matt at lanier.org
http://www.bearlywornpacifica.com


More information about the SanFrancisco-pm mailing list