Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations

[Pablo Velasquez]

Hi,
Hum, we did have a Tempe meeting (about 3 weeks ago) but we decided it made
more sense to be a part of the Phoenix group, safety in numbers type of
thing :)

The Perl course is going forward. I called a few people at ASU last week
discussing possible guidelines for us to follow.

If you find any information please let me (us?) :)
know...

-Pablo

At 12:56 PM 10/12/99 -0400, you wrote:
>
>Pablo -
>If I remember correctly, you were considering putting together a Tempe
>group. I believe I would be interested in this. Keep me posted on any
>progress there. Also, keep me (us?) posted on the plan to put together a
>college course on Perl.
>
>thanks =)
>-scott
>
>
>On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Bryan Lane wrote:
>
>> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:26:23 -0700
>> From: Bryan Lane <Bryan.Lane at VITALPS.COM>
>> Reply-To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
>> To: "'phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org'"
>    <phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org>
>> Subject: RE: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
>> 
>> I think 9:00 is late enough for me too.  I drive
>> all the way to Apache Junction, so it take about
>> an hour to get home.
>> 
>> Bryan
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Shay Harding [mailto:mekla at geocities.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 7:16 AM
>> To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
>> Subject: RE: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
>> 
>> 
>> I tend to agree since on these days I leave work, drive home 30 miles then
>> drive back 40 miles so I'm about ready by 9pm to leave.
>> 
>> 
>> Shay
>> 
>> 
>> >I vote for the current setup.  I have a long drive also, and need to leave
>> >at 9pm.  
>> >
>> >
>> >				Dave
>> >
>> >
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >From: Douglas E. Miles [mailto:doug.miles at bpxinternet.com]
>> >Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 7:58 AM
>> >To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
>> >Subject: Re: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
>> >
>> >
>> >Phaedrus wrote:
>> >> 
>> >> I'm sure everyone with a white board would be swearing they would trade
>> >> their left kidney for an LCD projector... but for the sake of newbies, I
>> >> agree (by typing or otherwise) code snippits thought of during the
>> >> discussion should be made visable.
>> >> This brings up another point. Why is everyone is eager to bail at
9:pm? I
>> >> think if we moved the meetings to the local pub, we may find people much
>> >> more willing to stick around for a while.
>> >> -scott
>> >
>> >Part of that is probably my fault.  When we were meeting at AZFamily, we
>> >didn't have a computer, projector, drinks, etc.  I have to stay after to
>> >clean everything up (and have a 30 min. drive to get home), so I might
>> >tend to push people out the door around 9:00.  Sorry. :)  We can discuss
>> >some alternatives.  We have had purely social meetings in the past.  If
>> >people want to suggest somewhere to have one, and there is interest,
>> >I'll schedule one.  Also, If we want to locate a place nearby that
>> >people can migrate after the meeting, that would be cool too.  Any other
>> >thoughts/ideas?
>> >
>> >-- 
>> >People understand instinctively that the best way for computer
>> >programs to communicate with each other is for each of the them
>> >to be strict in what they emit, and liberal in what they accept.
>> >The odd thing is that people themselves are not willing to be
>> >strict in how they speak, and liberal in how they listen.
>> >--Larry Wall, 2nd State of the Onion Address, August 1998
>> >
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------
>> Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed"
>> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>> Content-Description: 
>> ----------------------------------------
>> 
>