Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations

Phaedrus phaedrus at endless.org
Tue Oct 12 11:56:36 CDT 1999


Pablo -
If I remember correctly, you were considering putting together a Tempe
group. I believe I would be interested in this. Keep me posted on any
progress there. Also, keep me (us?) posted on the plan to put together a
college course on Perl.

thanks =)
-scott


On Tue, 12 Oct 1999, Bryan Lane wrote:

> Date: Tue, 12 Oct 1999 09:26:23 -0700
> From: Bryan Lane <Bryan.Lane at VITALPS.COM>
> Reply-To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
> To: "'phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org'"
    <phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org>
> Subject: RE: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
> 
> I think 9:00 is late enough for me too.  I drive
> all the way to Apache Junction, so it take about
> an hour to get home.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Shay Harding [mailto:mekla at geocities.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 11, 1999 7:16 AM
> To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
> Subject: RE: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
> 
> 
> I tend to agree since on these days I leave work, drive home 30 miles then
> drive back 40 miles so I'm about ready by 9pm to leave.
> 
> 
> Shay
> 
> 
> >I vote for the current setup.  I have a long drive also, and need to leave
> >at 9pm.  
> >
> >
> >				Dave
> >
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Douglas E. Miles [mailto:doug.miles at bpxinternet.com]
> >Sent: Friday, October 08, 1999 7:58 AM
> >To: phoenix-pm-list at happyfunball.pm.org
> >Subject: Re: Phoenix.pm: meeting recommendations
> >
> >
> >Phaedrus wrote:
> >> 
> >> I'm sure everyone with a white board would be swearing they would trade
> >> their left kidney for an LCD projector... but for the sake of newbies, I
> >> agree (by typing or otherwise) code snippits thought of during the
> >> discussion should be made visable.
> >> This brings up another point. Why is everyone is eager to bail at 9:pm? I
> >> think if we moved the meetings to the local pub, we may find people much
> >> more willing to stick around for a while.
> >> -scott
> >
> >Part of that is probably my fault.  When we were meeting at AZFamily, we
> >didn't have a computer, projector, drinks, etc.  I have to stay after to
> >clean everything up (and have a 30 min. drive to get home), so I might
> >tend to push people out the door around 9:00.  Sorry. :)  We can discuss
> >some alternatives.  We have had purely social meetings in the past.  If
> >people want to suggest somewhere to have one, and there is interest,
> >I'll schedule one.  Also, If we want to locate a place nearby that
> >people can migrate after the meeting, that would be cool too.  Any other
> >thoughts/ideas?
> >
> >-- 
> >People understand instinctively that the best way for computer
> >programs to communicate with each other is for each of the them
> >to be strict in what they emit, and liberal in what they accept.
> >The odd thing is that people themselves are not willing to be
> >strict in how they speak, and liberal in how they listen.
> >--Larry Wall, 2nd State of the Onion Address, August 1998
> >
> 
> ----------------------------------------
> Content-Type: text/html; name="unnamed"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Description: 
> ----------------------------------------
> 




More information about the Phoenix-pm mailing list