[Pdx-pm] interesting testing hole thats been dug

[chromatic]

On Thursday 04 January 2007 10:04, Wil Cooley wrote:

> Yes, that certainly makes sense.  It obviously doesn't make sense to
> require $obj->isa('Net::FTP'), because with duck-typing it doesn't
> actually have to be a subclass.  How thoroughly should I test with
> $obj->can() for the object's abilities?

Using Test::MockObject::Extends gives you a mock object that actually is-a 
appropriately.

-- c