[Melbourne-pm] Top 100 fail bug-squash, TONIGHT, 6:30pm

andrew Dent sgc294 at internode.on.net
Tue Sep 8 23:01:58 PDT 2009


I'm on Strawberry as well.

Ryan, Martin G wrote:
> Is Strawberry a different beast to Cygwin? 
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: melbourne-pm-bounces+martin.g.ryan=team.telstra.com at pm.org [mailto:melbourne-pm-bounces+martin.g.ryan=team.telstra.com at pm.org] On Behalf Of Jacinta Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2009 3:35 PM
> To: Melbourne Perlmongers
> Subject: Re: [Melbourne-pm] Top 100 fail bug-squash, TONIGHT, 6:30pm
>
> Paul Fenwick wrote:
>
>   
>>   * FCGI (FCGI 0.67)
>>     
>
> Systems and Perl versions
>
> cygwin:  5.10.0
> linux:   5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.8.7, 5.6.2
> solaris: 5.10.0
>
>   
>>   * Test::Class  (Test-Class 0.32_1)
>>     
>
> MSWin32  No test reports at all
> cygwin:  No test reports at all
>
> freebsd: 5.10.1, 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.6.2
> linux:   5.10.1, 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
> netbsd:  5.10.0
> solaris: 5.10.1
>
>   
>>   * List::MoreUtils (requires C programming skills)
>>     
>
> Developer release: 0.25_2
>
> freebsd: 5.6.2
> linux: 5.6.2
>
> Latest distribution (0.22 (2nd July 2006)) according to META.yml:
>
> MSWin32: 5.10.0, 5.8.6
> linux: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.8.6
> mirbsd: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
> openbsd: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
>
>
> It looks like linux with Perl 5.10.0 and 5.8.9 is a good candidate platform for
> these and other modules for testing.  Otherwise Windows with cygwin and Perl 5.10.0
>
> All the best,
>
> 	J
>
>
>   



More information about the Melbourne-pm mailing list