[Melbourne-pm] Top 100 fail bug-squash, TONIGHT, 6:30pm
andrew Dent
sgc294 at internode.on.net
Tue Sep 8 23:01:58 PDT 2009
I'm on Strawberry as well.
Ryan, Martin G wrote:
> Is Strawberry a different beast to Cygwin?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: melbourne-pm-bounces+martin.g.ryan=team.telstra.com at pm.org [mailto:melbourne-pm-bounces+martin.g.ryan=team.telstra.com at pm.org] On Behalf Of Jacinta Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, 9 September 2009 3:35 PM
> To: Melbourne Perlmongers
> Subject: Re: [Melbourne-pm] Top 100 fail bug-squash, TONIGHT, 6:30pm
>
> Paul Fenwick wrote:
>
>
>> * FCGI (FCGI 0.67)
>>
>
> Systems and Perl versions
>
> cygwin: 5.10.0
> linux: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.8.7, 5.6.2
> solaris: 5.10.0
>
>
>> * Test::Class (Test-Class 0.32_1)
>>
>
> MSWin32 No test reports at all
> cygwin: No test reports at all
>
> freebsd: 5.10.1, 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.6.2
> linux: 5.10.1, 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
> netbsd: 5.10.0
> solaris: 5.10.1
>
>
>> * List::MoreUtils (requires C programming skills)
>>
>
> Developer release: 0.25_2
>
> freebsd: 5.6.2
> linux: 5.6.2
>
> Latest distribution (0.22 (2nd July 2006)) according to META.yml:
>
> MSWin32: 5.10.0, 5.8.6
> linux: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8, 5.8.6
> mirbsd: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
> openbsd: 5.10.0, 5.8.9, 5.8.8
>
>
> It looks like linux with Perl 5.10.0 and 5.8.9 is a good candidate platform for
> these and other modules for testing. Otherwise Windows with cygwin and Perl 5.10.0
>
> All the best,
>
> J
>
>
>
More information about the Melbourne-pm
mailing list