[Melbourne-pm] An old one but an important one

[leif.eriksen at hpa.com.au]

I am actually but am b/w limited to reading it atm...

L 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Fenwick [mailto:pjf at perltraining.com.au] 
> Sent: Monday, 21 January 2008 1:11 PM
> To: Leif Eriksen
> Cc: melbourne-pm at pm.org
> Subject: Re: [Melbourne-pm] An old one but an important one
> 
> G'day Leif / MPM,
> 
> leif.eriksen at hpa.com.au wrote:
> > I wonder if this kind of thing should be added to the 
> Kwalitee checks ?
> 
> I was thinking the exact same thing myself this morning.  I 
> think making sure these variables are not used would be an 
> excellent Kwalitee check.
> 
> You don't happen to be on the perl-qa list by any chance?
> 
> Cheerio,
> 
> 	Paul
> 
> --
> Paul Fenwick <pjf at perltraining.com.au> | http://perltraining.com.au/
> Director of Training                   | Ph:  +61 3 9354 6001
> Perl Training Australia                | Fax: +61 3 9354 2681
> 
**********************************************************************
IMPORTANT
The contents of this e-mail and its attachments are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.  If
you received this e-mail in error, please notify the HPA Postmaster, postmaster at hpa.com.au,
then delete  the e-mail.
This footnote also confirms that this e-mail message has been swept for the
presence of computer viruses by Ironport. Before opening or using any
attachments, check them for viruses and defects.
Our liability is limited to resupplying any affected attachments.
HPA collects personal information to provide and market our services. For more
information about use, disclosure and access see our Privacy Policy at
www.hpa.com.au
**********************************************************************