[Melbourne-pm] Apache Cache

Scott Penrose scottp at dd.com.au
Mon Jul 3 19:58:07 PDT 2006

> Well, they could just use Cache::Memcached or Cache::Memcached::XS to
> replace the storage infrastructure under the unified cache module  
> with a
> memcached backed store. :)
> Seriously, Cache::Cache seems like the best generic interface to  
> storing
> the data available.  It is good, generic, widely available and  
> supports
> a large number of persistent and non-persistent storage models.
> Provide a couple of configuration options and you should be able to  
> let
> the end user select their storage -- be that file storage, shared
> memory, memcached, or whatever else.

Yes I agree. Cache::Cache with a Memcached backend, and possibly look  
at some of the built in Apache cahce backends - and we have the best  


More information about the Melbourne-pm mailing list