[Chicago-talk] The bummer of split lists

Elliot Shank chicago.pm at galumph.com
Mon Oct 8 12:04:07 PDT 2007

Andy Lester wrote:
> Thing is, Adam, my point was that there doesn't need to be a separate
> list.  We don't need to have two lists when it's largely overlap. 
> It's unnecessarily segregated.

Ummm... exactly how much traffic does that other list get?  I count a whopping grand total of 28 messages since June 1st, and the vast majority of them are duplicates of announcements included here.

Just ignore it Andy.  There's nothing there worth worrying about.

More information about the Chicago-talk mailing list