SPUG: ideas for future talks
Joshua D. Drake
jd at commandprompt.com
Wed Apr 21 15:15:57 PDT 2010
On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 14:36 -0700, Joshua ben Jore wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Noah Rømer <klevin at eskimo.com> wrote:
> > On 04/21/2010 12:53 PM, Andrew Sweger wrote:
> >> Sounds great. Can you have your presentation ready by May 18th?
> >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Noah Rømer wrote:
> >>> I heard several people last night mention that they'd like to hear talks
> >>> on Catalyst and MooseX. They're both topics I'd be interested in as
> >>> well, so I figured I'd throw them out there for the rest of the list to
> >>> ruminate on also.
> > Whoops, I should have made it clear that they are topics I would be
> > interested in hearing someone (else) do as well. Was chucking them out
> > as a conversation starter, so to speak.
> In particular, you and others claimed that using Moose+Catalyst made
> it obvious that this was a better way, also that it made it obvious
> that Rails is from a prior generation. I'd like to see those
> differences made clear.
You know... MST will be here in June I believe. We may want to see if he
can come up and talk to you guys about this.
Joshua D. Drake
> Seattle Perl Users Group Mailing List
> POST TO: spug-list at pm.org
> SUBSCRIPTION: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/spug-list
> MEETINGS: 3rd Tuesdays
> WEB PAGE: http://seattleperl.org/
PostgreSQL.org Major Contributor
Command Prompt, Inc: http://www.commandprompt.com/ - 503.667.4564
Consulting, Training, Support, Custom Development, Engineering
More information about the spug-list