SPUG: Hashes with Private/Hidden Values

Ingmar Ellenberger ingmar at site42.com
Tue May 8 08:15:05 PDT 2007

On 5/7/07, Joshua ben Jore <twists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 5/7/07, Ingmar Ellenberger <ingmar at site42.com> wrote:
> > 2. Is 'Hash::Private' an appropriate name, considering it's a hashref
> and
> > the term 'private' is way too overloaded?
> Does Tie::Hash::HiddenKeys make more sense to you? I don't immediately
> associate "undetectable" with your word "private."
> josh

Thanks Josh,

I like the 'HiddenKeys' suggestion.  Do you (or anyone) have any better
ideas for the Tie::Hash part?  Although this class uses a tied hash, it's
really meant to be used as an object (i.e. a hashref) and putting it under
Tie::Hash would be somewhat misleading.

 - Ingmar
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/spug-list/attachments/20070508/7dce3756/attachment.html 

More information about the spug-list mailing list