[oak perl] "The Irony of Extreme Programming"?

[David Fetter]

On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 09:02:00PM -0700, Robert Kuropkat wrote:

> I don't think there is **too** much smoking in the sense I think
> they have a legitement complaint.  

It's not the XP critics that are smoking crack; it's the XP advocates.

> Software development is not able to move fast enough and expecting
> people to know what they want all up front is truly a pipe dream.

So it is.  That is why you agree upon a change order process up front.
When a change order comes in, the people involved work together to
assess the affects on the schedule (yes, a schedule!) and the budget
(what?  people don't have infinite, or even indefinite amounts of
money to spend?!?), and then both parties sign off on said change
order, which includes the revised schedule and budget.

> Development methodologies do in fact need to be more agile.  

That's great, but XP isn't agile.  It's fragile and doesn't deliver.

> I just don't think they have solved as many problems with thier
> process as they think they have...

The only problem the XP people have solved is...come to think of it, I
can't think of a single problem they've *actually* solved.

Cheers,
D
-- 
David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100   mobile: +1 415 235 3778

Remember to vote!