[oak perl] Re: Checks
David Fetter
david at fetter.org
Sat Jun 28 12:42:37 CDT 2003
On Sat, Jun 28, 2003 at 10:41:27AM -0700, Arden Schaeffer wrote:
> On Date: Tuesday 24 June 2003 5:07 p.m., David Fetter
> > Given the situation with the check--$80 short at first cut--I have
> > a modest proposal: everybody pays exactly the same when we go out.
> > Yes, I'm aware that each time somebody "will get less than they
> > paid for," and somebody more, but in truth, what you're paying for
> > at a restaurant is only about 5% food, the rest going to
> > facilities, staff, the fact that you can send your food back if
> > you don't like it, etc., etc. If somebody eats grossly more than
> > everybody else in a situation like that, peer pressure works just
> > great. Anonymous bundles of cash going around the table
> > encourages people to...how do I put this gently...underestimate
> > their contribution.
> > What say we just set this as a policy in advance for the next one?
> To all: if we who consume very little are expected to pay for those
> who consume much, (which will put pressure to pay on us and pressure
> to not consume on them), then i won't attend.
While we seem to have a slight definitional difference of "consume,"
that being food/drinks vs. the restaurant experience, I agree that...
> A better policy would be to hold all meetings in places that give
> separate checks with good grace.
And Belden has come up with a slew of 'em :)
Cheers,
D
--
David Fetter david at fetter.org http://fetter.org/
phone: +1 510 893 6100 cell: +1 415 235 3778
More information about the Oakland
mailing list