[Kc] Object system

[Sterling Hanenkamp]

I'm not suggesting we remove explaining bless. I'm suggesting that in
addition to showing someone pipe, we also explain useful pipe-related tools
like cat, echo, tee, and xargs. It is a tutorial after all.

There's been about 10 years worth of tools to help with bless since that
document was written.

On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:29 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote:

> is it a deficiency? Are you going to bowdlerize "pipe" out of command
> line terminology too while you're at it? WORKSFORME NOTABUG DONTFIX
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:20 PM, Sterling Hanenkamp
> <sterling at hanenkamp.com> wrote:
> > Buahaha! So true... I should see if the perl-documentation project has
> any
> > plans to correct that particular deficiency.
> > The movie is Race to Witch Mountain. Do not recommend.
> > On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:16 PM, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> "toot the blessed hash" jokes
>



-- 
Andrew Sterling Hanenkamp
sterling at hanenkamp.com
785.370.4454
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20110407/e11f4d57/attachment.html>