[yapc] batman on imax
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Tue Jun 21 12:21:14 PDT 2005
>>>>> "Randal" == Randal L Schwartz <merlyn at stonehenge.com> writes:
Randal> And when you mean "full Imax movie", did it fill the Imax screen from
Randal> top to bottom (just like the imax previews), or just the middle third
Randal> of the screen (letterboxed)? I'd be surprised if they recut a Matrix
Randal> movie using Pan-and-Scan so that it was square instead of 2.35:1.
Randal> Especially when Pan-and-Scan for television is 1.85:1. I can't
Randal> imagine how much the editor has to work to get that into 1:1. :)
OK, looking closer, it's not 1:1, but rather 69.6:48.5, or a very narrow
1.44:1. But that's still taller and narrower than normal television.
--
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Perl/Unix/security consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See PerlTraining.Stonehenge.com for onsite and open-enrollment Perl training!
More information about the yapc
mailing list