From Dan at DWright.Org Wed Oct 1 07:00:18 2008 From: Dan at DWright.Org (Daniel J. Wright) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 10:00:18 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] YAPC Logo? Message-ID: <60239.216.92.130.24.1222869618.squirrel@webmail6.pair.com> Does YAPC have an official logo? I'm trying to work out what the YAPC 09 logo might be, and first I wanted to see if there are any guidelines I need to be working within. Currently, the thinking is that we'd like to do some sort of retro design for the 10th anniversary. So, I've been looking at the first YAPC's to draw some inspiration: http://yapc.org/America/previous-years/1999/ That logo might look cool with some sort of "+ 10" added on the end. Or even as "YAPC 109" http://yapc.org/America/previous-years/19100/ The logo used in 2000 seems to be the standard from 2000 until 2004. After that, there doesn't seem to be any consistency. Also, there seems to be a secondary logo, which existed since the very first YAPC, which is a "y" with a circle around it. It is used as the background image on the 2000 page, and is included in the postscript file that is linked from the 1999 page. Any thoughts? Also, if anybody happens to have high quality copies of the original artwork, I'd appreciate it if you could send me a copy. Thanks, -Dan From petek at bsod.net Wed Oct 1 07:15:08 2008 From: petek at bsod.net (Pete Krawczyk) Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 09:15:08 -0500 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] YAPC Logo? In-Reply-To: <60239.216.92.130.24.1222869618.squirrel@webmail6.pair.com> References: <60239.216.92.130.24.1222869618.squirrel@webmail6.pair.com> Message-ID: No, not really. The closest thing to an "official" logo is the Perl onion. In 2008, we used the Chicago flag with sigils in place of the stars. In 2007, Houston used the NASA logo with the onion inside of it. In 2006, we used the Camel (with O'Reilly's permission) starting the Great Chicago Fire. In 2005, Toronto used a "camoose". -Pete K On Wed, Oct 1, 2008 at 9:00 AM, Daniel J. Wright wrote: > Does YAPC have an official logo? > > I'm trying to work out what the YAPC 09 logo might be, and first I wanted > to see if there are any guidelines I need to be working within. > > Currently, the thinking is that we'd like to do some sort of retro design > for the 10th anniversary. So, I've been looking at the first YAPC's to > draw some inspiration: > > http://yapc.org/America/previous-years/1999/ > > That logo might look cool with some sort of "+ 10" added on the end. Or > even as "YAPC 109" > > http://yapc.org/America/previous-years/19100/ > > The logo used in 2000 seems to be the standard from 2000 until 2004. > After that, there doesn't seem to be any consistency. > > Also, there seems to be a secondary logo, which existed since the very > first YAPC, which is a "y" with a circle around it. It is used as the > background image on the 2000 page, and is included in the postscript file > that is linked from the 1999 page. > > Any thoughts? > > Also, if anybody happens to have high quality copies of the original > artwork, I'd appreciate it if you could send me a copy. > > Thanks, > -Dan > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Dan at DWright.Org Fri Oct 3 19:27:21 2008 From: Dan at DWright.Org (Daniel J. Wright) Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2008 22:27:21 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] YAPC Guests? Message-ID: <58028.71.60.117.220.1223087241.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> Who traditionally gets a special invite for YAPC? I would assume Larry Wall and any keynotes. Anybody else? What are the traditional accommodations / amenities provided? Thanks, -Dan From rdice at pobox.com Sat Oct 4 05:56:52 2008 From: rdice at pobox.com (Richard Dice) Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 08:56:52 -0400 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] YAPC Guests? In-Reply-To: <58028.71.60.117.220.1223087241.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> References: <58028.71.60.117.220.1223087241.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> Message-ID: <5bef4baf0810040556l23a3828hfbb969b7c1691c18@mail.gmail.com> At YAPC in Toronto the hotel I booked with gave me 1 free room for every 20 that I booked with my group. So that ended up being a pool of about 8 rooms I could comp people with. I don't have a firm memory of who I comped. Larry was one of them. I was comped as was I think 1 other organizing person -- I needed to be on call 24 hours a day, he was the head AV guy and lived about 70 miles outside of the city. "Speakers of special interest & need" is a good rule for comping of hotel rooms or providing other kinds of help. These are people who go to a _lot_ of conferences (as a lot of people want to see them talk) but who aren't generally funded by another entity to do so. And their open source involvements often mean they have to crimp their own money-earning potential in order to serve their open source efforts more fully. (Allison, Audrey, Damian are prime examples.) Perl is a community, which means it is communitarian. It's a good thing to help people who are members of the community who are in need (in the context of YAPC and no doubt other contexts too). Hope this helps! Cheers, - Richard On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Daniel J. Wright wrote: > > Who traditionally gets a special invite for YAPC? > > I would assume Larry Wall and any keynotes. Anybody else? > > What are the traditional accommodations / amenities provided? > > > Thanks, > -Dan > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbrandt at buffalo.edu Tue Oct 7 04:44:23 2008 From: cbrandt at buffalo.edu (Jim Brandt) Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 07:44:23 -0400 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] YAPC Guests? In-Reply-To: <5bef4baf0810040556l23a3828hfbb969b7c1691c18@mail.gmail.com> References: <58028.71.60.117.220.1223087241.squirrel@webmail2.pair.com> <5bef4baf0810040556l23a3828hfbb969b7c1691c18@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <48EB4B97.6050206@buffalo.edu> In my experience, the host committee creates a list of well known Perl people they would like to invite to speak and sends out the invitations. The earlier you can do this the better since they are often in demand for other events and might book something else. We've talked about extending the personal invitations beyond keynote-level speakers to try to make sure strong speaker submit talks, but I don't know how deep the past few organizers have gone. As far as helping with costs, I think that will depend on your budget and resources. The Perl speakers are amazing in that they often attend many events paying expenses out of their pocket. The conference attendance fee is waived, usually for all speakers. Anything you can do beyond that would be welcome, but not necessarily expected. If you are looking for precedent, most speakers have not received help in the past. To muddy the waters a bit, we have been funding travel for hackathons. So if a hackathon is attached to YAPC, you might consider submitting a proposal for travel help for the attached hackathon. That might be one way to help with costs. Jim Richard Dice wrote: > At YAPC in Toronto the hotel I booked with gave me 1 free room for every > 20 that I booked with my group. So that ended up being a pool of about > 8 rooms I could comp people with. I don't have a firm memory of who I > comped. Larry was one of them. I was comped as was I think 1 other > organizing person -- I needed to be on call 24 hours a day, he was the > head AV guy and lived about 70 miles outside of the city. > > "Speakers of special interest & need" is a good rule for comping of > hotel rooms or providing other kinds of help. These are people who go > to a _lot_ of conferences (as a lot of people want to see them talk) but > who aren't generally funded by another entity to do so. And their open > source involvements often mean they have to crimp their own > money-earning potential in order to serve their open source efforts more > fully. (Allison, Audrey, Damian are prime examples.) > > Perl is a community, which means it is communitarian. It's a good thing > to help people who are members of the community who are in need (in the > context of YAPC and no doubt other contexts too). > > Hope this helps! > > Cheers, > - Richard > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 10:27 PM, Daniel J. Wright > wrote: > > > Who traditionally gets a special invite for YAPC? > > I would assume Larry Wall and any keynotes. Anybody else? > > What are the traditional accommodations / amenities provided? > > > Thanks, > -Dan > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers -- Jim Brandt The Perl Foundation email: cbrandt at perlfoundation.org From Dan at DWright.Org Thu Oct 30 07:16:17 2008 From: Dan at DWright.Org (Daniel J. Wright) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:16:17 -0400 (EDT) Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus Message-ID: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> I'm working on a prospectus for potential YAPC::NA::09 sponsors. I'm looking for any of the following: * Documents used in past years. * Things that people wish they had done. * Suggestions on items that might be attractive to sponsors which we might be able to offer. * Stock text regarding Perl and YAPC that would appeal to potential sponsors. I realize that not all potential sponsors are looking for the same thing. So, there needs to be a balance between brevity and appealing to as many groups as possible. I think there's basically 4 categories of sponsors: 1. Philanthropists: Sponsors that just want to help Perl. Maybe they use it a lot and realize giving back to the community helps them in the long run. This group is perhaps the hardest to appeal to, but the easiest to please. 2. Advertisers: The most important thing to these people is getting their name out there in as many ways possible. 3. Recruiters: These people are hiring. They need programmers and are hoping that their money gets them some good leads on potential new hires. 4. All/None of the above: Some mixture of the above plus some other undefined quality that I'm missing. All input appreciated. -Dan From petek at bsod.net Thu Oct 30 08:17:24 2008 From: petek at bsod.net (Pete Krawczyk) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:17:24 -0500 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus In-Reply-To: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> References: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> Message-ID: Our 2006 sponsorship brochure is here: http://yapcchicago.org/yapc_sponsorship.pdf The job fair is one of the largest sources of sponsorship leads (a lot of places will throw $500 at you for a table). Keep in mind that some people will be critical of anything that looks like commercialism, as opposed to sponsorship. (We received a complaint this year about the logos on the shirt, for example.) Tangentially related: BarCamp Milwaukee had an interesting idea with their shirts - they put a bunch of areas on the shirt where words could be written - your name on top, and areas of interest on the bottom. http://flickr.com/photos/jennaddenda/2918492913/ I know for YAPC, it's three (or five!) days as opposed to 1, but this might be an interesting idea. On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 9:16 AM, Daniel J. Wright wrote: > I'm working on a prospectus for potential YAPC::NA::09 sponsors. I'm > looking for any of the following: > > * Documents used in past years. > > * Things that people wish they had done. > > * Suggestions on items that might be attractive to sponsors which we might > be able to offer. > > * Stock text regarding Perl and YAPC that would appeal to potential sponsors. > > I realize that not all potential sponsors are looking for the same thing. > So, there needs to be a balance between brevity and appealing to as many > groups as possible. I think there's basically 4 categories of sponsors: > > 1. Philanthropists: Sponsors that just want to help Perl. Maybe they use > it a lot and realize giving back to the community helps them in the long > run. This group is perhaps the hardest to appeal to, but the easiest to > please. > > 2. Advertisers: The most important thing to these people is getting their > name out there in as many ways possible. > > 3. Recruiters: These people are hiring. They need programmers and are > hoping that their money gets them some good leads on potential new hires. > > 4. All/None of the above: Some mixture of the above plus some other > undefined quality that I'm missing. > > > All input appreciated. > > -Dan > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > From autarch at urth.org Thu Oct 30 08:28:20 2008 From: autarch at urth.org (Dave Rolsky) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:28:20 -0500 (CDT) Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus In-Reply-To: References: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > Keep in mind that some people will be critical of anything that looks > like commercialism, as opposed to sponsorship. (We received a > complaint this year about the logos on the shirt, for example.) Do the sponsors actually ask to have their logos on the shirts, or did someone just volunteer this? I'm one of those people who hate this. I don't wear the YAPC shirts from 2006 on because of this, except under another shirt. FWIW, when we did Frozen Perl nobody asked about getting their logo on the shirt, and we didn't offer it. I would _love_ to see a return to the logo-less shirts so I can start wearing them during the summer again. -dave /*============================================================ http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) ============================================================*/ From petek at bsod.net Thu Oct 30 08:32:53 2008 From: petek at bsod.net (Pete Krawczyk) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:32:53 -0500 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus In-Reply-To: References: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> Message-ID: In 2006, which was the first year this was done, we actually had sponsors request this, because it was what they were used to from other conferences. We repeated in 2008 for the same reason. I can only assume 2007 was the same way. -Pete K On 10/30/08, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > >> Keep in mind that some people will be critical of anything that looks >> like commercialism, as opposed to sponsorship. (We received a >> complaint this year about the logos on the shirt, for example.) > > Do the sponsors actually ask to have their logos on the shirts, or did > someone just volunteer this? > > I'm one of those people who hate this. I don't wear the YAPC shirts from > 2006 on because of this, except under another shirt. > > FWIW, when we did Frozen Perl nobody asked about getting their logo on the > shirt, and we didn't offer it. > > I would _love_ to see a return to the logo-less shirts so I can start > wearing them during the summer again. > > > -dave > > /*============================================================ > http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org > Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) > ============================================================*/ > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > From fluhmann at gmail.com Thu Oct 30 08:54:27 2008 From: fluhmann at gmail.com (Jeremy Fluhmann) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 10:54:27 -0500 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus In-Reply-To: References: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> Message-ID: <7f7c2d5e0810300854g5e619d72t2e27e1cb3ee30b40@mail.gmail.com> On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > In 2006, which was the first year this was done, we actually had > sponsors request this, because it was what they were used to from > other conferences. We repeated in 2008 for the same reason. > > I can only assume 2007 was the same way. Yes, it was. I don't have the document that we used in Houston, but Wade or Will might. Jeremy On 10/30/08, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > > > >> Keep in mind that some people will be critical of anything that looks > >> like commercialism, as opposed to sponsorship. (We received a > >> complaint this year about the logos on the shirt, for example.) > > > > Do the sponsors actually ask to have their logos on the shirts, or did > > someone just volunteer this? > > > > I'm one of those people who hate this. I don't wear the YAPC shirts from > > 2006 on because of this, except under another shirt. > > > > FWIW, when we did Frozen Perl nobody asked about getting their logo on > the > > shirt, and we didn't offer it. > > > > I would _love_ to see a return to the logo-less shirts so I can start > > wearing them during the summer again. > > > > > > -dave > > > > /*============================================================ > > http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org > > Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) > > ============================================================*/ > > _______________________________________________ > > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cbrandt at buffalo.edu Thu Oct 30 11:49:38 2008 From: cbrandt at buffalo.edu (Jim Brandt) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2008 14:49:38 -0400 Subject: [Yapc-na-organizers] Sponsorship prospectus In-Reply-To: <7f7c2d5e0810300854g5e619d72t2e27e1cb3ee30b40@mail.gmail.com> References: <4350.10.8.0.6.1225376177.squirrel@webmail9.pair.com> <7f7c2d5e0810300854g5e619d72t2e27e1cb3ee30b40@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: <490A01C2.5090300@buffalo.edu> It would be cool to save this sort of support material up on the wiki so future organizers could find it without having to track everyone down. http://www.perlfoundation.org/perl_event_organizers/index.cgi Jeremy Fluhmann wrote: > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:32 AM, Pete Krawczyk > wrote: > > In 2006, which was the first year this was done, we actually had > sponsors request this, because it was what they were used to from > other conferences. We repeated in 2008 for the same reason. > > I can only assume 2007 was the same way. > > > Yes, it was. > > I don't have the document that we used in Houston, but Wade or Will might. > > Jeremy > > > On 10/30/08, Dave Rolsky > wrote: > > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008, Pete Krawczyk wrote: > > > >> Keep in mind that some people will be critical of anything that > looks > >> like commercialism, as opposed to sponsorship. (We received a > >> complaint this year about the logos on the shirt, for example.) > > > > Do the sponsors actually ask to have their logos on the shirts, > or did > > someone just volunteer this? > > > > I'm one of those people who hate this. I don't wear the YAPC > shirts from > > 2006 on because of this, except under another shirt. > > > > FWIW, when we did Frozen Perl nobody asked about getting their > logo on the > > shirt, and we didn't offer it. > > > > I would _love_ to see a return to the logo-less shirts so I can start > > wearing them during the summer again. > > > > > > -dave > > > > /*============================================================ > > http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org > > Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless) > > ============================================================*/ > > _______________________________________________ > > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > > > _______________________________________________ > YAPC-NA-organizers mailing list > YAPC-NA-organizers at pm.org > http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/yapc-na-organizers > > -- Jim Brandt The Perl Foundation email: cbrandt at perlfoundation.org