[Wellington-pm] Meeting Next Month
sam at vilain.net
Sun Sep 4 15:44:04 PDT 2005
On Fri, 2005-08-26 at 08:21 +1200, Andrew McMillan wrote:
> If you're going to cover these then you should probably give some time
> to Git as well. It looks likely to me that Catalyst will be choosing
> Git for projects that suit distributed revision control for the future.
> Now that we have a reliable CVS -> Git conversion it is possible that we
> may switch entirely to Git.
Great. Because I can mirror and commit to Git repositories with
Well, in theory, anyway. I still haven't tried that. Of course CVS to
Subversion migration is turn-key, but doesn't do the funky merge
detection stuff that Martin's migration script does.
If the Jury's out on SVK vs Git, they might well come back with a
verdict of complete ambivalence.
Maybe we should just scrap the TBA section on arch and get Martin to
talk about Git instead?
More information about the Wellington-pm