suggest DBIx::Concept for module name?

[abez]

Have you guys looked at Tangram or Taboo? These are OOP wrappers for a RDBMS
persistence layer. It's pretty spiffy.


-- 
abez----- ----- ------ - ------ -- ------------
http://www.abez.ca/ Abram Hindle (abez at abez.ca)
--- --- ------ --------- - - ------ --------abez

On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Darren Duncan wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Nov 2002, Peter Scott wrote:
> > Thanks.  Try these:
> > DBIx::Transparent
> > DBIx::NoSQL
> > DBIx::SQLless
> > DBIx::Portable
>
> Thank you, Peter; they look like good suggestions.  Perhaps one of my
> larger goals is to avoid the caller doing any sql (except in stored
> procedures), so it might be good to mention it.  The 'Portable' angle was
> also appealing and one of the first things I thought of; it would also
> provide a bit of parity with my previous largeish abstraction project,
> 'CGI::Portable' (where rather than DBMSs, it is web server protocols or
> their extension interfaces that are abstracted away).  'Portable' is also
> short, which is good.  However, the main reason I was seeking other names
> is because portability seemed to be on the verge of being over-used as
> jargon, kind of like 'thinking outside the box'; using it doesn't have as
> powerful an affect as it used to.  Of course, in the end it may turn out
> to be exactly the right name to use.  But I'm still exploring other
> options like the 'NoSQL' suggestion you made.  Thank you. -- Darren Duncan
>
>