[tpm] why wouldn't violating "use warnings" always be fatal?

Olaf Alders olaf.alders at gmail.com
Fri Aug 22 11:52:09 PDT 2014

On Aug 22, 2014, at 2:46 PM, J. Bobby Lopez <jbl at jbldata.com> wrote:

> Compare the actual build number, since the base version number may be the same, but builds are most likely different, especially across distros. It may be that your dev environment has something like a 'no warnings q{uninitialized}' coded into some library on the dev side that doesn't exist in production. Just a guess.

Is it possible you have strictures enabled somewhere in production but not locally?



More information about the toronto-pm mailing list