[tpm] Subroutine arcana

Richard Dice rdice at pobox.com
Mon May 14 07:13:54 PDT 2007


Could you post the code in question, or at least a minimal demo that shows
what it is that you have a question regarding?

Cheers,
Richard

On 5/14/07, arocker at vex.net <arocker at vex.net> wrote:
>
>
> Does anyone know if it is legitimate to use an anonymous subroutine in a
> named one? I've run across a case in someone else's code, and the
> expression using the anonymous routine simply seems to be ignored, neither
> executing nor generating a complaint.
>
> I believe, (and taught), that named subroutines cannot be nested, but when
> I sought guidance in the canon, it was strangely silent about the nesting
> of either type.
>
> _______________________________________________
> toronto-pm mailing list
> toronto-pm at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/toronto-pm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/toronto-pm/attachments/20070514/d5106993/attachment.html 


More information about the toronto-pm mailing list