[Thousand-Oaks-pm] Next TO Perl Mongers is coming up; presenters wanted!

[shawn faison]

Sounds really awesome. I am going to try my hardest to be there.

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:03 PM, David Oswald <daoswald at gmail.com> wrote:

> I should be able to make it (depends on my wife's work schedule at the
> hospital, but I think she's off that night, which means I'm available).
> That being the case, I'm wondering if I might ask for five or ten minutes
> at the end, beginning, during the intermission, or even at the pub
> afterwards to brainstorm on a problem I'm having with CPAN smoke testers
> that is stalling progress on Inline::CPP.
>
> I've already been working pretty closely with Rob "sisyphus" (current
> maintainer of Inline, Inline::C, and InlineX::CPP2XS), but we're both
> stumped.  We haven't gotten any additional clues from the inline mailing
> list, and a message to the smoke-test-discuss didn't get us very far either.
>
> Anyone wanting to look ahead of time check the CPAN distribution for
> Inline::CPP version 0.33_008 Developer's release, see the current test
> results here:
> http://static.cpantesters.org/distro/I/Inline-CPP.html#0.33_008 and/or
> look at my github repo's 'dev' branch for Inline::CPP.  The github repo is
> here:  git at github.com:daoswald/Inline-CPP.git
>
> In brief the issue is that when the test suite is run by smoke testers
> there's a strong possibility that they will issue a FAIL because
> Inline::CPP can't locate Parse::RecDescent.  The common solutions such as
> ensuring Makefile.PL is writing out the PREREQ_PM parameter seem to have
> all been checked.  The issue seems to be a bad interaction between how
> smoke test configurations constrain @INC and how Inline (a dependency for
> Inline::CPP) fiddles with @INC.  Attempts to load Parse::RecDescent
> chronologically before Inline gets loaded haven't helped much, though a
> test script that use does a "use_ok" on Parse::RecDescent passes if it
> doesn't load Inline::CPP.
>
> I would be looking for ideas on how to track down where things are going
> awry.
>
> Maybe that's off topic, or too obscure of an issue to be worthy of the
> Mongers time, but if there's an interest, I could sure use a suggestion or
> two.
>
> Dave
>
>
> --
>
> David Oswald
> daoswald at gmail.com
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ThousandOaks.pm - Thousand Oaks Perl Mongers
> Website:      http://thousand-oaks.pm.org/
> Mailing list: http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/thousand-oaks-pm
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/thousand-oaks-pm/attachments/20120131/bd2e981e/attachment.html>