SPUG: XPath on (less-than-perfect) HTML
Michael R. Wolf
MichaelRWolf at att.net
Tue Dec 8 23:59:58 PST 2009
On Dec 8, 2009, at 7:44 PM, Yitzchak Scott-Thoennes wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Michael R. Wolf
> <MichaelRWolf at att.net> wrote:
[...]
>> Could the only difference be that I've got to be explicit with the
>> XML::LibXML parser about recovering on non-well-formed input while
>> the HTML one already (tacitly) expects non-well-formed.
>
> No personal experience, but it's not just about recovering, but
> recovering the way a browser would have interpreted the HTML.
Good point. Thanks. Do you know if it has a "quirks mode"?
> From the TreeBuilder POD:
>
[...]
>> -- because,
>> as Roseanne Rosannadanna once said, "it's always something".
Or, as my Dad said. If it's not one thing, it's ... 10!
--
Michael R. Wolf
All mammals learn by playing!
MichaelRWolf at att.net
More information about the spug-list
mailing list