SPUG: when is 5.10 not > 5.8?

Michael R. Wolf MichaelRWolf at att.net
Wed Jan 16 08:54:51 PST 2008


> On Jan 15, 2008 12:58 PM, Mike Schuh <schuh at farmdale.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'm trying to install some modules from CPAN, having just upgraded from
> > Perl 5.8.8 to 5.10.0  Most of what I want to install has worked OK.
> >
> no, you upgraded from Perl 5.008_008 to 5.010_000.

[...]

> > perl -v returns
> >
> > This is perl, v5.10.0 built for i686-linux
> >
> it's rather unfortunate that perl's version is advertised as something
> it's not... or that it's stored as something it's not... anyway,
> things will compare nicely if you fix as i've suggested.

Unfortunate?  If I didn't like Perl so much, I'd call it professional
malpractice to require one form but report another.

At least 'perldoc -f use' shows the "5.006_001" form.  Is this still
preferred to 'v5.6.1'?

-- 
Michael R. Wolf
    All mammals learn by playing!
        MichaelRWolf at att.net



More information about the spug-list mailing list