SPUG: Please, enough about editors
Andrew Sweger
andrew at sweger.net
Fri Jun 17 18:51:01 PDT 2005
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Jeremy G. Kahn wrote:
> [sensitive subject] is a recipe for a flurry of unsubscribes.
So far, no unsubscribe storm. The following isn't totally accurate (in
fact, I'm sure it's a load of BS since I did it by hand). Think of it as
just-for-fun.
Date #Subd unsub(-) sub(+) eom(X)
-------- ----- ------------------------------------------------------
Mar 2004: (384) --------------X+++++
Apr 2004: (375) --------X+++
May 2004: (370) -----X++++
Jun 2004: (369) -------X+++++++
Jul 2004: (369) --------X++++++++++++++
Aug 2004: (375) ----------X++++
Sep 2004: (369) ---X+++++++++++++
Oct 2004: (379) --------X+++++++
Nov 2004: (378) ----X++++
Dec 2004: (378) ----X++++++++++
Jan 2005: (384) --X+++++
Feb 2005: (387) ---X+++++++
Mar 2005: (391) ------X++++++++
Apr 2005: (393) --X+++++++++
May 2005: (400) ----------------X++++++++++
The surge of sub/unsubs last month were largely the result of subscribers
at various AT&T domains swtiching over to Cingular, Comcast, etc.
--
Andrew B. Sweger -- The great thing about multitasking is that several
things can go wrong at once.
More information about the spug-list
mailing list