SPUG: software libertarianism (was: Scope question)
dancerboy
dancerboy at strangelight.com
Thu Jun 13 13:14:43 CDT 2002
At 9:38 am -0700 2002-06-13, Dan Ebert wrote:
>On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 23:35, dancerboy wrote:
>> Java and C# are meant for large-scale applications, not one-liners.
>
>I hope you are not implying perl cannot be used to write large
>applications. I have seen perl used effectively for some decent size
>(and fairly complex) programs.
I would say that there's significant overlap in what different
languages are good for. Java is crappy for one-liners, but great for
medium- to large-scale applications. Perl is great for one-liners,
crappy for truly *large*-scale applications. For medium-sized
applications, Perl can be great OR crappy, depending on the skills of
the developer(s) involved. To paraphrase something I say on my web
page: Perl empowers programmers to write code in any way that they
want. In many cases, however, that means empowering programmers to
write code very, very badly.
-jason
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://seattleperl.org
More information about the spug-list
mailing list