SPUG: Results of Work Space Survey
dancerboy
dancerboy at strangelight.com
Tue Nov 20 10:47:54 CST 2001
At 5:28 AM -0800 11/20/01, Richard Anderson wrote:
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "dancerboy" <dancerboy at strangelight.com>
>
>
>> For me, I
>> would gladly trade physical desk space for screen real-estate. I
>> think I waste much more time shuffling the windows and icons on my
>> desktop than I do shuffling physical objects. I just recently got a
>> second monitor for my home office, and not only do I believe that
>> this has made a huge improvement in my productivity, but I don't
>> think I've even come close to maxing out the improvements that
>> increased screen real-estate *could* make. I think I could have 4 or
>> 5 monitors on my desk before I started seeing diminishing returns.
>>
>Interesting idea. I generally address this concern by using the multiple
>desktops that Gnome and CDE provide (and Windows has yet to provide -
>grrr!).
I don't think that multiple virtual desktops are nearly as helpful
for me as actual monitors: when working on complex coding projects,
I find it extremely helpful to have the source-code windows of
different, interacting parts of the system all visible at the same
time. This lets me see the interactions immediately, at a glance,
instead of having to piece things together mentally bit-by-bit. Not
only is it quicker, but it's much less error-prone: whenever I
minimize or otherwise hide a source-code window, and then refer back
to it mentally, there's always the danger that I will be remembering
what's *supposed* to be there, rather than what actually *is* there.
I think a significant portion of the bugs in my code come from errors
in the way that distant sections of code interact with each other --
errors that would most likely have been obvious if I had actually
looked at the sections of code side-by-side.
Add to this the usefulness of also having a couple of pages of
perldoc, a page out of CPAN, some sample-code, and a helpful posting
or three from usenet or SPUG *also* visible, and I think I could
quite easily put 6 monitors to good use.
> Wouldn't you get neck strain from swivelling your head to look at 5
>different monitors? Or are you talking about a long table with 5
>workstations and 5 chairs?
No, I mean a single workstation with 4-5 monitors. My desk at home
has several tiers, so I can stack monitors vertically as well as
horizontally. Even with 6 monitors (oh, how I wish!) my desktop
wouldn't need to be more than 3 monitors wide. I also try to sit as
far back from the monitors as practical, to avoid eye-strain -- which
also reduces the amount I have to swivel my head to view multiple
monitors.
>
>I agree that the current monitors are too small and don't have enough
>resolution. Also, they are too bulky and difficult to position easily. But
>desktop ergonomics are improving, and I look forward to lightweight
>flat-panel displays that are large, high-res, easy on the eyes and easy to
>position.
Have you seen the (relatively) new Apple cinema-displays? *drool*
If only I had an extra $2500 laying around...
-jason
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://zipcon.net/spug/
More information about the spug-list
mailing list