SPUG: Question for somebody
Creede Lambard
creede at rrauto.com
Thu Nov 2 12:55:34 CST 2000
If the object is created properly you should be able to undef it or just let
it go out of scope as long as there are no more references to it.
I say "if it is created properly" because I've seen some objects that don't
seem to work this way. For instance there appears to be a memory leak in
Win32::ODBC. Repeatedly creating and destroying Win32::ODBC objects (in my
experience at least) causes your process' memory footprint to creep up a
step at a time. Usually, though, the above will do the trick.
----- Original Message -----
From: Owskey, Tom <tom.owskey at attws.com>
To: <spug-list at pm.org>
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:19 AM
Subject: SPUG: Question for somebody
> Hi can anybody tell me how to destroy an object to keep the program from
> eating up memory.
>
> Thomas Owskey.
>
> - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
> POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
> Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
> Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
> For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
> Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://www.halcyon.com/spug/
>
>
>
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
POST TO: spug-list at pm.org PROBLEMS: owner-spug-list at pm.org
Subscriptions; Email to majordomo at pm.org: ACTION LIST EMAIL
Replace ACTION by subscribe or unsubscribe, EMAIL by your Email-address
For daily traffic, use spug-list for LIST ; for weekly, spug-list-digest
Seattle Perl Users Group (SPUG) Home Page: http://www.halcyon.com/spug/
More information about the spug-list
mailing list