[sf-perl] Real perl
Dodger
el.dodgero at gmail.com
Wed Apr 11 03:38:26 PDT 2012
Sent from my iPhone
On 10/04/2012, at 3:56 PM, Jeffrey Thalhammer <jeff at imaginative-software.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 9, 2012, at 3:19 AM, Dodger wrote:
>
>> So... How about some old school perl without mooses and meeses?
>>
>> Anybody out there code in... You know... Perl?
>
> Not here.
>
> The Pinto project was my first deep-dive into Moose. Now I won't do anything without it. Here's why:
>
> Economy: Moose greatly reduces the amount of code I have to write and test. Less code means fewer bugs. And the remaining bugs that I do create are a lot easier to spot when the aren't swimming in a sea of getters/setters and other loosely related methods
sub AUTOLOAD {}
Who writes accessors?
> Organization: Roles, type definitions, and meta extensions each give me convenient "compartments" for my code. Each compartment is isolated, reusable, and testable. I find this much faster to write and easier to use than piling everything into traditional classes.
I don't see any issue with this in Perl.
> Community: The MooseX namespace has a ton of wonderful extensions. The've solved problems for me that I didn't even know I had.
CPAN has been doing that for almost 2 decades.
> -Jeff
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/sanfrancisco-pm/attachments/20120411/05836b51/attachment.html>
More information about the SanFrancisco-pm
mailing list