[sf-perl] thread resolution, for now (was Re: [list etiquette])

Earl Ruby eruby at knowledgematters.net
Wed Jan 6 11:02:00 PST 2010

On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 12:34 PM, Simon Wistow <simon at thegestalt.org> wrote:
> The mailing list mention in my collation had an interesting solution -
> we had the main list 'void' which has reply-to munging and then
> 'void-pure' which did not. The two were subscribed to each other and you
> just subbed to which ever flavour you liked.

You mean that people might want more than one option? Sounds like
you're advocating that "there's more than one way to do it"...

Interesting that so many folks on the Perl list are sure that there's
only one right way.


Earl Ruby

More information about the SanFrancisco-pm mailing list