[sf-perl] Senior Perl Programmer (Contract)
Randal L. Schwartz
merlyn at stonehenge.com
Mon Jan 4 16:40:57 PST 2010
>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Amshey <parallax99 at hotmail.com> writes:
Stefan> Oh sorry folks... forgot about reply-to-all.... *blush*
which is why http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
is especially useful on one particular dimension:
if reply-to is set, an error results in TOO MANY PEOPLE SEEING IT
if reply-to is not set, the error results in too few people, which can be
remedied by resending.
Why in the world, in this day and age, does anyone still set reply-to
for lists? Haven't we all learned the "wide reply" button in our
mailer by now?
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion
More information about the SanFrancisco-pm