[sf-perl] Senior Perl Programmer (Contract)

[Randal L. Schwartz]

>>>>> "Stefan" == Stefan Amshey <parallax99 at hotmail.com> writes:

Stefan> Oh sorry folks... forgot about reply-to-all.... *blush*

which is why http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
is especially useful on one particular dimension:

if reply-to is set, an error results in TOO MANY PEOPLE SEEING IT

if reply-to is not set, the error results in too few people, which can be
remedied by resending.

Why in the world, in this day and age, does anyone still set reply-to
for lists?  Haven't we all learned the "wide reply" button in our
mailer by now?

-- 
Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095
<merlyn at stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>
Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc.
See http://methodsandmessages.vox.com/ for Smalltalk and Seaside discussion