[sf-perl] OT: Secure password storage
sphink at gmail.com
Thu Jan 15 10:42:39 PST 2009
Or if you fear the openssl command line, as I do, there's always
dd if=/dev/urandom bs=1024 count=1 | base64
I suppose openssl rand is probably more trustable for randomness. Best
would be /dev/random, but you might have quite a wait if you use
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:23 AM, David Alban <extasia at extasia.org> wrote:
> heh. i sure did. thanks.
> online communities rule.
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Randal L. Schwartz
> <merlyn at stonehenge.com> wrote:
>> You missed "openssl rand -base64 1024", eh?
> Live in a world of your own, but always welcome visitors.
> SanFrancisco-pm mailing list
> SanFrancisco-pm at pm.org
More information about the SanFrancisco-pm