[Rio-pm] TIOBE Programming Community Index for January 2008 (JALR)

breno breno em rio.pm.org
Quarta Janeiro 9 13:12:49 PST 2008


A capacidade dos seres humanos em criar fatos incontestáveis a partir
de análises deturpadas apenas para ajustar o mundo à sua própria
realidade fantástica e incontestável nunca deixa de me surpreender.

Será que ele excluiu os sites sobre café (java), e cobras venenosas
(python)?  :-)

[]s

-b

On Jan 9, 2008 4:55 PM, Bruno Buss <bruno.buss em gmail.com> wrote:
> Just Another Languages Ranking :P
>
> http://www.tiobe.com/tpci.htm
>
> Parece que eles pegam os dados a partir de... sites de busca O_O
> Até youtube ta no meio... acho que temos que por mais vídeos de Perl no
> youtube :P
>
> 1 - Java
> 2 - C
> 3 - (Visual) Basic
> 4 - PHP
> 5 - C++
> 6 - Python
> 7 - Perl
>
> Alguns trechos dos comentários:
> Python é bom mesmo....
> "Python has been declared as programming language of 2007" ???
> "Last month Python surpassed Perl for the first time in history, which is an
> indication that Python has become the "de facto" glue language at system
> level." ?????????
> "It[Python] is especially beloved by system administrators and build
> managers." ????????
>
> Que ranking é esse?
> "At the beginning of 2007, I thought C# and D would become the winners and
> Perl and Delphi the losers. C# was indeed one of the big winners, and Perl
> one of the big losers." - Esse eu juro que não entendi. C# caiu 1 posição
> junto com Perl, e C# é um vencedor e o Perl é o grande perdedor O.o (Nada
> tendencioso :P)
>
> "What about 2008? C, C++ and Perl will continue to fall." -> "Perl is just
> dead."
> Alguem poderia mandar o Perl Survey pra eles? xD
>
>
> []'s
> --
> Bruno C. Buss
>
> Aluno do DCC - UFRJ - www.dcc.ufrj.br
> Membro do GRIS - UFRJ - www.gris.dcc.ufrj.br
>
> "The universe doesn't care what you believe. The wonderful thing about
> science is that it doesn't ask for your faith, it just asks for your eyes."
> — xkcd.com
>
> "There is a ton of evidence both in computing and outside of it which shows
> that poor security can be very much worse than no security at all. In
> particular stuff which makes users think they are secure but is worthless is
> very dangerous indeed." — Alan Cox
>
> "You know, you really are supposed to understand the code you are
> modifying..." — Al Viro
> _______________________________________________
> Rio-pm mailing list
> Rio-pm em pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/rio-pm
>


Mais detalhes sobre a lista de discussão Rio-pm