Phoenix.pm: "Why Not To Use Foreign Keys" ?

[Anthony Nemmer]

What about the APL character set? .... Let's FUSE Perl 6 with APL. That 
would be the ultimate computer language! =)

Tony

Scott Walters wrote:

>Interesting. And Larry Wall, the other day, put %foo`bar to rest. It
>won't be in Perl 6. %foo<<bar>> (and the Unicode version) will be the
>prefered method for subscripting with constants.
>
>-scott
>
>On  0, Bill Lindley <wlindley at wlindley.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>...linked from a Slashdot thread, it's the MySQL developers eating 
>>humble pie... funny reading in a 'cvs commit' diff..
>>
>>---begin quote---
>>- at cindex foreign keys, reasons not to use
>>+ at cindex foreign keys, why not implemented
>>
>>-There are so many problems with foreign key constraints that we don't
>>-know where to start:
>>+Many database scholars and programmers feel very strongly that
>>+referential integrity should be enforced inside the database server.
>>---end quote---
>>
>>much more at
>>
>>http://lists.mysql.com/internals/1771
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 

SKYKING, SKYKING, DO NOT ANSWER.