Phoenix.pm: The Perl Review

[Scott Walters]

Isn't the Perl Journel having a rough time of it now? Isn't perlmonks.org
a good forum for writting freeware articles? Isn't the perl community
segmented right now? Don't we have 20 different versions of each module
the most popular of which is huge and shows signs of age? Don't
negitive disposed questions annoy you? 

On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Doug Miles wrote:

> Bill Nash wrote:
> 
> > I haven't had a chance to look at it yet, but did they go a bit overboard
> > with the first edition at all? Do you think it'll be hard to keep enough
> > material going into further issues?
> 
> 
> No, quite the contrary.  It was a simple PDF with a few articles.  They 
> are attempting to "release early and release often" to bootstrap 
> themselves into a dead tree version.
> 
> 
> > Oh, hi, btw. I subbed late last week. I'm Bill Nash (the semi-notorious
> > billn of #perl). Yes, I live in Phoenix (east valley), so please, don't
> > panic. =)
> > 
> > - billn
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 4 Feb 2002, Frooninckx Craig - cfroon wrote:
> > 
> > 
> >>Very nice, I actually prefer them to be on-line, get them sooner and print
> >>them if you want.
> >>
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: doug.miles at bpxinternet.com [mailto:doug.miles at bpxinternet.com]
> >>Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 9:33 AM
> >>To: Phoenix.pm
> >>Subject: Phoenix.pm: The Perl Review
> >>
> >>
> >>For those of you who haven't heard, The Perl Mongers are starting a new
> >>magazine.  Here is the first issue:
> >>
> >>http://www.perl.org/ThePerlReview/
> >>
> >>
> >>*********************************************************************
> >>
> >>The information contained in this communication is
> >>confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
> >>named above, and may be legally privileged.
> >>If the reader of this message is not the intended
> >>recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
> >>distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly
> >>prohibited.
> >>If you have received this communication in error,
> >>please re-send this communication to the sender and
> >>delete the original message or any copy of it from your
> >>computer system. Thank You.
> >>
> >>
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>