From ken at bitsko.slc.ut.us Mon Feb 4 13:37:36 2002 From: ken at bitsko.slc.ut.us (Ken MacLeod) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Submitting patches to module maintainers In-Reply-To: "James.FitzGibbon"'s message of "Thu, 31 Jan 2002 08:16:05 -0600" References: Message-ID: "James.FitzGibbon" writes: > Hopefully most people are familiar with SourceForge, the Open-Source > project hosting site where you can start an Open Source project and > have access to a private CVS repository, web space, the ability to > release tarballs, mailing lists, bug reporting, etc. If you're not > familiar, please check out www.sf.net. > > The idea I had was to promote the idea of getting module developers > to host their modules on SourceForge. As a module developer and avid SourceForge user, I agree completely. As a module developer who is currently in that "hiatus" stage, I can also mention that not always are there people ready to step in and help out keeping the modules current with bug reports :-( As Dave R. mentions, who hosts the bug list isn't so important (esp. if one is crappy ;). rt.cpan.org is particularly good for Perl module writers since its focus is on Perl and is hooked into CPAN search. -- Ken -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From autarch at urth.org Sat Feb 9 21:18:32 2002 From: autarch at urth.org (Dave Rolsky) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Next meeting? Message-ID: Well, we missed the first Wednesday for a social meeting. When would be a good time to regularly have these so they don't have to be scheduled? I figure it should be X Wednesday of the month (though not the last) at 7:00 PM at the Stonehouse. Also, for the next presentation meeting, are there any volunteers out there? I'm out of ideas to talk about, I'm afraid. I'm still up for the code kitchen or code review sessions but there didn't seem to be a lot of enthusiasm for either besides Ken and I... Are there topics people really want to hear about? If so, let the list know because there might be someone who is competent to talk about it reading this who hasn't thought of giving a talk on it. Anyway, if this is going to happen it'll be at 7PM on Wednesday, February 27th. -dave /*================== www.urth.org we await the New Sun ==================*/ -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From james at ehlo.com Sun Feb 10 09:43:20 2002 From: james at ehlo.com (James FitzGibbon) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Next meeting? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20020210154320.GA15426@ehlo.com> * Dave Rolsky (autarch@urth.org) [020209 21:31]: > Also, for the next presentation meeting, are there any volunteers out > there? I'm out of ideas to talk about, I'm afraid. I'm still up for the I'd be interested in a round-table on Web Services, specifically using them with transports other than HTTP. Jabber might be a good one to start with, since it could lead into other topic ideas. -- j. ...Last night I lay in bed looking up at the stars in the sky, and I thought to myself, where the heck is the ceiling? -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From john.erjavec at intel.com Wed Feb 13 21:32:46 2002 From: john.erjavec at intel.com (John Erjavec V) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Fwd: Mason as CGI and problems with autohandlers Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20020213223052.03930f08@mail.pconline.com> All- I sent this off to the Mason mailing list, but got no response. If there is anyone here that uses Mason, and has any idea what is going on (and would be willing to share that info with me), that would be great. Thanks a bunch. -JEV -- John Erjavec V ## spammers-will-be-reported@jevonline.com ## http://www.jevonline.com/jev/index.html Men are from Earth, women are from Earth. Deal with it. >Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2002 20:35:44 -0500 >To: mason-users@lists.sourceforge.net >From: John Erjavec V >Subject: Mason as CGI and problems with autohandlers > >All- > >I'm running into a weird problem here. No matter what I do, I get an >error in the error_log saying: 'handler "html-mason" not found for: >'. If I put a page together and have <% 2+2 %> in it, the page >renders as '4', but I still get the error. When I try to start using an >autohandler, the page doesn't render at all, and I get a bunch of errors >in the log. The errors are here: > >======================= error_log errors >================================== >[Sun Feb 10 23:23:43 2002] [warn] [client 192.168.10.6] handler >"html-mason" not found for: /home/httpd/html/mason_test/index2.html >error while executing /mason_test/autohandler: >could not find component for path 'comp/metatags' > HTML::Mason::Interp::__ANON__('could not find component for path > \'comp/metatags\'^J') called at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 596 > >HTML::Mason::Request::comp('HTML::Mason::Request=HASH(0x832dc50)', >'comp/metatags') called at /home/httpd/mason/obj/mason_test/autohandler >line 16 > HTML::Mason::Commands::__ANON__() called at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Component.pm line 131 > >HTML::Mason::Component::run('HTML::Mason::Component::FileBased=HASH(0x81dc4f0)') >called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 653 > eval {...} called at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 653 > >HTML::Mason::Request::comp('HTML::Mason::Request=HASH(0x832dc50)', >'HASH(0x835beec)', 'HTML::Mason::Component::FileBased=HASH(0x81dc4f0)') >called at /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 159 > eval {...} called at > /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Request.pm line 159 > >HTML::Mason::Request::exec('HTML::Mason::Request=HASH(0x832dc50)', >'/mason_test/index2.html') called at >/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.005/HTML/Mason/Interp.pm line 243 > HTML::Mason::Interp::exec('HTML::Mason::Interp=HASH(0x832dc5c)', > '/mason_test/index2.html') called at /home/httpd/cgi-bin/handler.cgi line > 17 >======================= error_log errors >================================== > >My httpd.conf file contains: > >DocumentRoot /home/httpd/html >ScriptAlias /cgi-bin/ /home/httpd/cgi-bin/ >Action html-mason /home/httpd/cgi-bin/handler.cgi > > > SetHandler html-mason > > >and I have a handler.cgi script in /home/httpd/cgi-bin/ that is included >below: > >======================= handler.cgi ================================== >#!/usr/bin/perl -w >use CGI; >use HTML::Mason; >use HTML::Mason::Utils qw(cgi_request_args); > >my $interp = new HTML::Mason::Interp (comp_root=>'/home/httpd/html', > data_dir=>'/home/httpd/mason'); > >my $q = new CGI; >my $comp = $ENV{'PATH_TRANSLATED'}; >my $root = $interp->comp_root; >$comp =~ s/^$root// > or die "Requested file '$comp' is outside component root '$root'"; >my %args = cgi_request_args($q, $q->request_method); >print $q->header; > >$interp->exec($comp, %args); >======================= handler.cgi ================================== > >I have all my comps in a directory called 'comp' off of /home/httpd/html, >and I call them a 'comp/metatags' and such. (I also tried having them >right in the comp root, and that didn't work either.) > >Any ideas on what is going on here? It seems like I don't have something >quite right here, but I can't see what it is. Any help >appreciated. Thanks. > >-JEV -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From ken at mathforum.org Wed Feb 13 23:30:12 2002 From: ken at mathforum.org (Ken Williams) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Fwd: Mason as CGI and problems with autohandlers In-Reply-To: <4.3.2.7.2.20020213223052.03930f08@mail.pconline.com> Message-ID: On Wednesday, February 13, 2002, at 09:32 PM, John Erjavec V wrote: > All- > > I sent this off to the Mason mailing list, but got no response. If > there is anyone here that uses Mason, and has any idea what is going on > (and would be willing to share that info with me), that would be > great. Thanks a bunch. I answered it just now on the Mason list, see whether that helps. -Ken -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From john.erjavec at intel.com Thu Feb 14 06:55:01 2002 From: john.erjavec at intel.com (Erjavec, John) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Fwd: Mason as CGI and problems with autohandlers Message-ID: -----Original Message----- I answered it just now on the Mason list, see whether that helps. -------------------------- Thanks. I'll check it out when I get home. -JEV -- John Erjavec V ** john.erjavec@intel.com My views are my own. I do not speak for anyone other than myself. We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on when it's necessary to compromise. -- Larry Wall -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From siegler at visi.com Thu Feb 14 16:44:10 2002 From: siegler at visi.com (Chris Siegler) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Is 5.6 faster than 5.005? Message-ID: <20020214164410.A2337@localhost.localdomain> I have some code that parses html (using HTML::TreeBuilder) that I run off my shell account. It's very cpu intensive stuff. Would Perl 5.6 run this code faster than 5.005? I was trying to get the sysadmin to upgrade Perl (they have a build from 1999 running), but he doesn't agree that a newer binary would help run time. I really don't know much about Perl's compilation phase, so don't have much to go on, but I think 5.6 would be faster. Is there any page out there benchmarking versions of Perl (towers of hanoi, etc.)? Chris -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From autarch at urth.org Thu Feb 14 16:55:49 2002 From: autarch at urth.org (Dave Rolsky) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Is 5.6 faster than 5.005? In-Reply-To: <20020214164410.A2337@localhost.localdomain> Message-ID: On Thu, 14 Feb 2002, Chris Siegler wrote: > I have some code that parses html (using HTML::TreeBuilder) that I run > off my shell account. It's very cpu intensive stuff. Would Perl 5.6 run > this code faster than 5.005? I was trying to get the sysadmin to upgrade > Perl (they have a build from 1999 running), but he doesn't agree that a > newer binary would help run time. I really don't know much about Perl's > compilation phase, so don't have much to go on, but I think 5.6 would be > faster. Is there any page out there benchmarking versions of Perl > (towers of hanoi, etc.)? It is highly unlikely to the best of my knowledge. From what I've seen following discussions on the Perl5-porters list, Perl 5 has basically gotten a bit slower with each major release. For example, Perl 5.6.0 added a lot of Unicode stuff that slows down certain string operations. OTOH, certain individual things have sometimes been sped up a lot. There is a perlbench test that I see referred to on p5p. Basically, there's no reason to upgrade to 5.6.1 unless there are language features you need (or modules that use those language features). -dave /*================== www.urth.org we await the New Sun ==================*/ -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From matt at omega.org Sat Feb 16 13:13:16 2002 From: matt at omega.org (Matt Johnson) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: First Annual Google Programming Contest Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020216131115.00afd0a0@pop-server.mn.rr.com> This might be kind of fun. Implementing Ken's AI project comes to mind. I didn't see that they would accept perl entries, though. They're strange. http://www.google.com/programming-contest/ -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From autarch at urth.org Sat Feb 16 15:04:16 2002 From: autarch at urth.org (Dave Rolsky) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: First Annual Google Programming Contest In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20020216131115.00afd0a0@pop-server.mn.rr.com> Message-ID: On Sat, 16 Feb 2002, Matt Johnson wrote: > > This might be kind of fun. Implementing Ken's AI project comes to mind. I > didn't see that they would accept perl entries, though. They're strange. > > http://www.google.com/programming-contest/ They've explicitly said C++ or Java only. Lame. -dave /*================== www.urth.org we await the New Sun ==================*/ -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From jamesludlow at yahoo.com Mon Feb 18 10:57:08 2002 From: jamesludlow at yahoo.com (James Ludlow) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: First Annual Google Programming Contest In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020218165708.31987.qmail@web14307.mail.yahoo.com> --- Dave Rolsky wrote: > > http://www.google.com/programming-contest/ > > They've explicitly said C++ or Java only. Lame. Actually, they'll accept entries in Python as well. -- Jim __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From bwallace at tecnetx.com Tue Feb 19 11:12:02 2002 From: bwallace at tecnetx.com (bwallace@tecnetx.com) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Monthly meeting Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.0.20020219111119.00b48830@pop3.iexposure.com> I'm new to this posting. Will there be a meeting this month? If so, where. Thanks. -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From autarch at urth.org Tue Feb 19 13:19:52 2002 From: autarch at urth.org (Dave Rolsky) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Monthly meeting In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020219111119.00b48830@pop3.iexposure.com> Message-ID: On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 bwallace@tecnetx.com wrote: > I'm new to this posting. Will there be a meeting this month? If so, > where. Thanks. Yes, there will. I'm not sure where. Asbent a presentation I was going to simply suggest we have a social meeting at the previously agreed upon location, the Stonehouse. So let's say that there wlil be a social meeting on Wednesday, February 27, at 7 PM. We will be at the Stonehouse (http://twincities.citysearch.com/profile/5593545/). Does whoever suggested this place know if we would need a reservation? -dave /*================== www.urth.org we await the New Sun ==================*/ -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From jim at acadcam.com Tue Feb 19 13:24:17 2002 From: jim at acadcam.com (Jim Anderson) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Monthly meeting In-Reply-To: ; from autarch@urth.org on Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:19:52PM -0600 References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020219111119.00b48830@pop3.iexposure.com> Message-ID: <20020219132417.A5385@acadcam.com> On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:19:52PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 bwallace@tecnetx.com wrote: > > > I'm new to this posting. Will there be a meeting this month? If so, > > where. Thanks. > > Yes, there will. I'm not sure where. Asbent a presentation I was going > to simply suggest we have a social meeting at the previously agreed upon > location, the Stonehouse. > > So let's say that there wlil be a social meeting on Wednesday, February > 27, at 7 PM. We will be at the Stonehouse > (http://twincities.citysearch.com/profile/5593545/). > > Does whoever suggested this place know if we would need a reservation? Based on the amount the place is filled on the times I've been there? No reservations needed. If somebody wants to get a count and call them up, they might appreciate it, if nothing else to arrange some tables together. I'm fairly sure I'll make it to the meeting. -- Jim Anderson (612) 782-0456 jim@acadcam.com Anderson CAD/CAM, Inc Lucifer designed MS-DOS to try 3800 Apache Lane NE men's souls. St Anthony, MN 55421 Then he had a better idea... -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. From matt at omega.org Mon Feb 25 23:17:32 2002 From: matt at omega.org (Matt Johnson) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:29:33 2004 Subject: [mplspm]: Monthly meeting In-Reply-To: <20020219132417.A5385@acadcam.com> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020219111119.00b48830@pop3.iexposure.com> Message-ID: <5.1.0.14.2.20020225231650.02701408@pop-server.mn.rr.com> It a social meeting at the Stonehouse still a go this week? -Matt Johnson At 01:24 PM 2/19/2002, you wrote: >On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:19:52PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002 bwallace@tecnetx.com wrote: > > > > > I'm new to this posting. Will there be a meeting this month? If so, > > > where. Thanks. > > > > Yes, there will. I'm not sure where. Asbent a presentation I was going > > to simply suggest we have a social meeting at the previously agreed upon > > location, the Stonehouse. > > > > So let's say that there wlil be a social meeting on Wednesday, February > > 27, at 7 PM. We will be at the Stonehouse > > (http://twincities.citysearch.com/profile/5593545/). > > > > Does whoever suggested this place know if we would need a reservation? > >Based on the amount the place is filled on the times I've been there? >No reservations needed. If somebody wants to get a count and call them >up, they might appreciate it, if nothing else to arrange some tables >together. I'm fairly sure I'll make it to the meeting. > >-- >Jim Anderson (612) 782-0456 jim@acadcam.com >Anderson CAD/CAM, Inc Lucifer designed MS-DOS to try >3800 Apache Lane NE men's souls. >St Anthony, MN 55421 Then he had a better idea... > > >-------------------------------------------------- >Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list > >To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org >with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message. -------------------------------------------------- Minneapolis Perl Mongers mailing list To unsubscribe, send mail to majordomo@pm.org with "unsubscribe mpls" in the body of the message.