[Melbourne-pm] Google Wave Anyone?
daniel at rimspace.net
Wed Oct 28 23:11:47 PDT 2009
Toby Corkindale <toby.corkindale at strategicdata.com.au> writes:
> Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Toby Wintermute <tjc at wintrmute.net> writes:
>>> In other news; I'm liking Moose a lot, especially since the .9 release
>>> with all the built-in attributes and corresponding traits.. but I'm
>>> curious to know what everyone else thinks of Moose.
>>> It's evidently superior to Perl's existing OO framework, which has been
>>> showing it's age and tacked-on-afterwards feel for a long time..
>> Well, Moose is pretty much just syntax sugar and convention, sitting over the
>> top of the traditional Perl OO design. Aside from the crazy syntax hacks like
>> Method::Signature, it really doesn't do that much different...
> Mmm, doesn't Moose implement "diamond" inheritance too? (Although I suppose
> one could get that with Class::C3 outside of Moose if they desired)
That is a fair cop: yes, Moose imports Class::C3, so gets a saner multiple
inheritance search order than stock Perl. OTOH, Perl itself is importing C3
into core because the alternatives are pretty crazy.
I /think/ that is about the last bit of difference though.
✣ Daniel Pittman ✉ daniel at rimspace.net ☎ +61 401 155 707
♽ made with 100 percent post-consumer electrons
Looking for work? Love Perl? In Melbourne, Australia? We are hiring.
More information about the Melbourne-pm