daniel at rimspace.net
Thu May 29 04:06:41 PDT 2008
Scott Penrose <scottp at dd.com.au> writes:
> On 29/05/2008, at 8:56 PM, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>> Unfortunately my fairly persistent cold seems to be acting up again, so
>> the odds of my having missed the point seem high. Sorry. It wasn't my
>> attention to waste your time.
> Your feedback has been great. And I hope that I can get you to review
> my documentation when I update it.
I do my best. I still feel that I am missing something, probably in how
the tokens are going to be used, that makes them less security critical
than I perceive.
Hopefully updated documentation will make that clear, though, by
discussing the sort of role where they are applicable. It certainly
wouldn't /hurt/ compared to many of the available modules which simply
don't discuss that.
More information about the Melbourne-pm