[Kc] mad idea
David Nicol
davidnicol at gmail.com
Wed Sep 11 22:27:17 PDT 2013
1: the team gets very familiar with APR
2: the team gets very familiar with Perl internals
3: Perl (the language) gets abstracted away from Perl (the compatibility
layer)
I'm not sure if any of those meet the "besides" criterion.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Teal <ironicface at earthlink.net> wrote:
> What would the advantages be?
> Besides sheer geek bravado display :)
>
> Teal
>
>
> Anyone for creating a fork of Perl that uses APR for platform abstraction
> (instead of native Perl platform abstraction?)
>
>
>
> --
> You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing listkc at pm.orghttp://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing list
> kc at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>
--
You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20130912/41146808/attachment.html>
More information about the kc
mailing list