[Kc] mad idea

David Nicol davidnicol at gmail.com
Wed Sep 11 22:27:17 PDT 2013


1: the team gets very familiar with APR
2: the team gets very familiar with Perl internals
3: Perl (the language) gets abstracted away from Perl (the compatibility
layer)

I'm not sure if any of those meet the "besides" criterion.

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:31 PM, Teal <ironicface at earthlink.net> wrote:

>  What would the advantages be?
> Besides sheer geek bravado display  :)
>
> Teal
>
>
>  Anyone for creating a fork of Perl that uses APR for platform abstraction
> (instead of native Perl platform abstraction?)
>
>
>
>  --
> You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing listkc at pm.orghttp://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> kc mailing list
> kc at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>



-- 
You've got to wiggle before you can crawl
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20130912/41146808/attachment.html>


More information about the kc mailing list