[Kc] reply-to munging

[Don Ellis]

Looks like it's fixed now. I'll continue to complain if I see it on another
list. To the other list, that is.

--Don Ellis


On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Andrew Moore <amoore at mooresystems.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Don Ellis <don.ellis at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I thought we had commented on this some time ago. I agree that "reply to
> > list" makes much more sense.
>
> OK. I'll consider that consensus that we should change. I've "flipped
> the bit" and so this email should have the reply-to header set right,
> I think.
>
> Cheers,
> -Andy
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20101222/8353dbe2/attachment.html>