[Kc] editors and IDEs (was: May Meeting)
davidnicol at gmail.com
Wed May 7 13:13:54 PDT 2008
On Wed, May 7, 2008 at 7:57 PM, Andrew Moore <amoore at mooresystems.com> wrote:
> For instance, if I have a CGI object, which is an object with a
> "param" method, I should be able to type:
the conventions to understand such things are well established in practice;
the perl IDE could note that C<my $cgi= CGI->new> for instance occurred,
and adjust accordingly.
An editor supporting a style is a very strong motivation to use that
style; I started using FIXME in comments because gvim highlights it;
whenever I find myself having to use a different editor that
supposedly is aware of perl syntax I discover that it will match
active and commented-out closing brace pairs and then for the next few
weeks I will be very careful
to comment out some matching syntax whenever I comment out uneven braces.
> and it should offer "param" as a completion to that. Maybe I have to
> hit my "autocomplete" button (M-/), or maybe if I pause it just offers
> a little drop-down of options (think "Google Suggests"), but it should
> know that "param" is an option, and "parmesan" is not. (Maybe it
> should also know that that method takes 0 or 1 parameters.)
> If if I have just defined a hash with a set of keys in it, and I type
> the first half of one of the keys, it should suggest some of the keys
> as possible completions.
> Or, If I start typing a bare word, it may suggest some of the subs in
> the current package or core as options.
> Some other languages have editors that do some of these things. Perl
> doesn't really (yet).
All the features that "use strict" demands are syntactic and would
(provided that the editor can find the module files) be excellent
candidates for marking in an editor.
More information about the kc