[Kc] Why Corporates Hate Perl

djgoku djgoku at gmail.com
Thu Aug 21 09:52:12 PDT 2008

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 11:42 AM, David Nicol <davidnicol at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 6:29 AM, Emmanuel Mejias
> <emmanuel.mejias at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Interesting article I came across on Slashdot. Sorry if this is not appropriate for the mailing list
> When I read the second sentence my thought was, "he's sending this to
> kclug, right? He should send it to KCPM, it would be totally on-topic
> there."  Then I saw which mailing list it was sent to.
> I would like to experiment with a mailing list rule, which is as follows:
> "Style questions, including propriety for the forum, are to be handled
> off-list.  When in doubt, strip weakening statements of insecurity and
> post.  As someone who subscribes to this mailing list, the things that
> interest you have a high probability of interesting the other
> subscribers."
> in keeping with the above edict, please reply off-list.  (or violate
> it, and reply on-list, demonstrating that you would like your perl
> mongers mailing list to degenerate into a noisy series of points of
> order.)

Haha, I had to un-subscribe from all the noise on the KCLUG mailing
list. I don't really see that happening to this list.


More information about the kc mailing list