[Kc] DBIx::Class or Class::DBI

[James Carman]

Thanks! You all helped a lot. I think the boss is gonna pick DBIx::Class.

 
To quote the folks on #perl @ irc.freenode.net:

14:46:25< zostay> can somebody summarize the diff between Classs::DBI andDBIx::Class? i want to make sure i remember correctly before answer aPM list message
14:49:28 < mst> zostay: DBIx::Class obsoletes Class::DBI
14:49:48 < cfedde> DBIx::Class works better.
14:50:03 < zostay> then my memory serves... :)
14:50:27< mst> zostay: DBIx::Class also provides a full compatibilitylayer for Class::DBI, which in 08100 is better tested than Class::DBIand being maintained 
                by Scgwern himself
14:51:35 < cfedde> s/cg/ch/

Cheers,
Sterling (aka zostay)


On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:41 PM, Kit Peters <popefelix at gmail.com> wrote:
I am personally enamoured with DBIC, and most of the Catalyst
documentation that I'm seeing assumes DBIC.  If I had to choose, I'd
go with DBIC right now.

KP




On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 2:35 PM,  <developer at peelle.org> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
>     Thanks in advance for your responces. My boss is doing the whole standardize thing. Luckily I have pretty well sealed the deal for us keeping Perl, and even using Catalyst. But What I was curious about was Which is better? DBIx::Class or Class::DBI. I read each one's description on cpan. and couln't pick out a clear advantage between them.
>
>  Any advice would be a great help.
>
>  Thanks,
>
>  James Carman
>  _______________________________________________
>  kc mailing list
>  kc at pm.org
>  http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
>



--
GPG public key fingerpint: 1A12 04B6 0C80 306A B292  14FD 2C7A 1037 F666 46A7



_______________________________________________
kc mailing list
kc at pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/kc
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/kc/attachments/20080403/fbf7da35/attachment.html