[pm-h] Thursday's meeting

[Julian Brown]

>For those people who came, did you like this format?

Yes

>For those people who presented, would you do it again?

Yes

>A request was made afterward to allow the talks to run to 10 minutes
>rather than being limited to 5. What do you think?

I think reasonable grace should be given, while being cognizant of the
number of presenters remaining.

Julian

On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 1:15 PM, G. Wade Johnson via Houston <houston at pm.org
> wrote:

> I'll get a full write-up on the meeting on-line this weekend, but I
> thought I would give a quick summary and poll the group.
>
> Original lightning talk volunteers: 9
> Volunteers who bailed on us: 2
> Total lightning talks given: 9
>
> 1 person gave a second lightning talk off the cuff.
> 1 person volunteered to give a lightning talk with no prep.
>
> 7 of the 9 talks finished in less than 5 minutes.
>
> For those people who came, did you like this format?
> For those people who presented, would you do it again?
>
> A request was made afterward to allow the talks to run to 10 minutes
> rather than being limited to 5. What do you think?
>
> G. Wade
> --
> Virtual is when it's not but it looks like it is and transparent is
> when it is but it looks like it isn't.                -- Rick Hoselton
> _______________________________________________
> Houston mailing list
> Houston at pm.org
> http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/houston
> Website: http://houston.pm.org/
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.pm.org/pipermail/houston/attachments/20141115/64dc7025/attachment.html>