From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 1 03:57:01 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <20031201095701.GB20435@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > ...and it is all highlighted correctly. Did it all indent properly? If it did, I suspect the same code will let it hilight properly too. Try some of the good ones like regular expressions with quotes in them. Steve From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 1 04:02:34 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Timeouts in modules In-Reply-To: <200311302003.16408.Simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> References: <200311301322.58452.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <200311301613.45715.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <200311302003.16408.Simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031201100234.GD20435@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Simon Waters wrote: > local $SIG{ALRM} = sub{ die "my own alarm" }; That is a a 5.8 thing, IIRC. Very nice though :) Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 1 04:11:45 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: <20031201095701.GB20435@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031201095701.GB20435@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 09:57, Steve Marvell wrote: > Try some of the good ones like regular expressions with quotes in > them. > The following stinkiness indents and highlights correctly (i.e. I press `tab' and it does the right thing: #!/usr/bin/perl use strict; use warnings FATAL => 'all'; $\ = qq[\n]; for( qw] this ain't no "joke" ] ) { my $test = $_; $test =~ s! # useful ('|") # comment !${{q"'"=>q'"'=>q'"'=>q"'"=>}}{$1}!xg; print $test; } exit; - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/yxPhy5o0lRFL2ooRAvz2AKDSEZDm/hqmviSwqzKxxq/TrKmw0ACeIfiz UiMePGsb/X666IO+Idvx/Uc= =1edr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 1 04:29:57 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: References: <20031201095701.GB20435@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031201102957.GA20867@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > The following stinkiness indents and highlights correctly (i.e. I press > `tab' and it does the right thing: Do you mean to say that cperl-mode will now indent anything correctly? Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 1 04:41:05 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: <20031201102957.GA20867@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031201102957.GA20867@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 10:29, Steve Marvell wrote: > Matthew Browning wrote: > > The following stinkiness indents and highlights correctly (i.e. I > > press `tab' and it does the right thing: > > Do you mean to say that cperl-mode will now indent anything > correctly? > That's what I am saying, yeah. Whether it is an improvement to GNU Emacs or to cperl-mode I cannot say; I have not had time recently to pore over either. I've been on this for about a week now, though, and I can't contrive any construct that causes it to misbehave (yet). Heredocs are not causing all code after them to be highlighted/indented as quoted matter either. Nor are formats. MB - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/yxrCy5o0lRFL2ooRAoW5AJ9/GnAIlOiOmFH6pyE94tJxCwikywCgjVEC p1hwu5MyAQDTjxauDoEapGM= =ktzX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 1 05:18:45 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: References: <20031201102957.GA20867@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031201111845.GA21054@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > > Do you mean to say that cperl-mode will now indent anything > > correctly? > > That's what I am saying, yeah. So, this indents properly, if typed from beginning to end. { /"/; print; } and how about this: { /"/; #" print; } Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 1 05:25:49 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: <20031201111845.GA21054@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031201111845.GA21054@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 11:18, Steve Marvell wrote: > > So, this indents properly, if typed from beginning to end. > [...] > and how about this: > [...] ...yes! I have just typed both of those examples in and they are formatted to my liking. MB - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/yyU9y5o0lRFL2ooRAmE8AKDM+e6+NimMF29ykTWmnB26GxlQNwCg5qsF yNz0L8LSi5OCEYJPp7B3HMs= =iBcU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 1 05:41:53 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: References: <20031201111845.GA21054@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031201114153.GA21139@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > ...yes! I have just typed both of those examples in and they are > formatted to my liking. Can you send me cperl-mode.el please. Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 1 06:23:58 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: emacs sytax highlighting in cperl-mode In-Reply-To: <20031201114153.GA21139@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031201114153.GA21139@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 01 December 2003 11:41, Steve Marvell wrote: > Matthew Browning wrote: > > ...yes! I have just typed both of those examples in and they are > > formatted to my liking. > > Can you send me cperl-mode.el please. > I did so. For the benefit of anyone on the list who might be interested, it turns out that I was comparing the relative merits of cperl-mode versions 5 and 4.23 (that latter is what you have got if you recently apt-getted emacs). The latest version on CPAN appears to be 4.32 but, as I mentioned, you can check out the latest sources from CVS. Details here: http://savannah.gnu.org/cvs/?group=emacs MB - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/yzLey5o0lRFL2ooRAkm/AJ4z3JdFR4lj2HWgwXxOHwbrZlrNbwCbBr5L Wj8kmoInkafjIo9Azqe+j6E= =MfTk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From mb at matthewb.org Tue Dec 2 01:56:42 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Advent calendar Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Forgot it was the first yesterday. 2003 calendar here: http://perladvent.org/2003/ Readers unfamiliar with this tradition will find it to be worth a look. MB - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/zEXBy5o0lRFL2ooRAnFaAKDIs/zLaI++vM6t6vH1cuWdQX2ZgQCbBJP+ blflzhg5dvrYX5DZM8NOdu0= =p9sT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Tue Dec 2 03:59:00 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting proposal Message-ID: <20031202095900.GA26125@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Thursday the 11th The Bank (tbc) Barnstaple Let's get the date sorted, then I can guage the suitability of the pub. Essentially, Barnstaple is so small it doesn't really matter where we meet, but I can't remember the name of the other one. Times will to suit train users. I'll meet one train from the station and take people into town. What train will people be getting in. Steve From mb at matthewb.org Tue Dec 2 04:12:49 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting proposal In-Reply-To: <20031202095900.GA26125@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031202095900.GA26125@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 December 2003 09:59, Steve Marvell wrote: > stuff I'll go. Can't find details anywhere of a place called `The Bank'. I'll try to convince someone to come with me. Motion to cancel scheduled meeting for last Thursday in December since I don't think the pubs will be open. MB - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/zGWhy5o0lRFL2ooRApqXAJ98MT2G7UtXNLCaUzGJhXXmnOKWVQCeNaMg UDJdhxKCKZ+MFzP/remc83w= =/GpU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From linux at codehelp.co.uk Tue Dec 2 13:23:27 2003 From: linux at codehelp.co.uk (Neil Williams) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting proposal In-Reply-To: References: <20031202095900.GA26125@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <200312021923.32076.linux@codehelp.co.uk> On Tuesday 02 Dec 2003 10:12 am, Matthew Browning wrote: > On Tuesday 02 December 2003 09:59, Steve Marvell wrote: > > stuff > > I'll go. Can't find details anywhere of a place called `The Bank'. I can make it. I found 62 The Bank via BT. The multimap is: http://www.multimap.com/map/browse.cgi?X=256000&Y=133000&scale=10000&coordsys=gb (01271) 324446 62, Boutport St Barnstaple EX31 1HG Is that the one, Steve? -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/archives/devoncornwall-pm/attachments/20031202/4b99bf33/attachment.bin From steve at devon-it.co.uk Wed Dec 3 05:43:59 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting proposal In-Reply-To: <200312021923.32076.linux@codehelp.co.uk> References: <20031202095900.GA26125@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <200312021923.32076.linux@codehelp.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031203114359.GA28433@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Neil Williams wrote: > Is that the one, Steve? I think so. To me it's "in town", so you have to park and walk anyway. Steve From linux at codehelp.co.uk Wed Dec 3 13:52:28 2003 From: linux at codehelp.co.uk (Neil Williams) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Little syntax query Message-ID: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> I'm confused over ? : conditionals If I have this code: if($asyncz == 0) {$port = $list[5];} else{ $port = $list[3];} Why doesn't this work instead? $asyncz ? $port = $list[5] : $port = $list[3]; Also, is ? : limited to if then else - if there is no else, do I have to use if() {} anyway? $ perl -e '$asyncz = 0 ; $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; print $port;' $ perl -e '$asyncz = 1; $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; print $port;'' Both give 3. My otherwise excellent documentation doesn't give an example. -- Neil Williams ============= http://www.codehelp.co.uk/ http://www.dclug.org.uk/ http://www.isbn.org.uk/ http://sourceforge.net/projects/isbnsearch/ http://www.biglumber.com/x/web?qs=0x8801094A28BCB3E3 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: signature Url : http://mail.pm.org/archives/devoncornwall-pm/attachments/20031203/8a306545/attachment.bin From steve at devon-it.co.uk Wed Dec 3 15:14:05 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Little syntax query In-Reply-To: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> References: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031203211405.GB29725@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Neil Williams wrote: > I'm confused over ? : conditionals a ? b : c if a then b else c > if($asyncz == 0) {$port = $list[5];} > else{ $port = $list[3];} > > Why doesn't this work instead? > $asyncz ? $port = $list[5] : $port = $list[3]; For one, the condition is the wrong way round, 0 being false. The other is that it's not idiomatic. And see perlop for why you don't put assignments inside them. You're also suffering from assigned-to conditional operator of the type: ($a_or_b ? $a : $b) = $c; Either of these are fine: $port = $asyncz ? $list[3] : $list[5] $port = $asyncz == 0 ? $list[5] : $list[3] $port = $list[$asyncz ? 3 : 5] $port = $list[$asyncz == 0? 5 : 3] > Also, is ? : limited to if then else - if there is no else, do I have to use > if() {} anyway? > > $ perl -e '$asyncz = 0 ; $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; print $port;' > $ perl -e '$asyncz = 1; $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; print $port;'' Try: perl -le '$asyncz = 0; $port = $asyncz ? 3 : 5; print $port;' perl -le '$asyncz = 1; $port = $asyncz ? 3 : 5; print $port;' > My otherwise excellent documentation doesn't give an example. perlop does. Steve From simon at wretched.demon.co.uk Wed Dec 3 15:16:11 2003 From: simon at wretched.demon.co.uk (Simon Waters) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Little syntax query In-Reply-To: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> References: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> Message-ID: <200312032116.13566.simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 03 December 2003 7:52 pm, Neil Williams wrote: > perl -e '$asyncz = 1; $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; print $port; I think you want..... perl -e ' $asyncz=1 ; $port = $asyncz ? 5 : 3 ; print $port,"\n";' Ah "man perlop" covers your very example - RTFM ;) $asyncz ? $port = 5 : $port = 3; becomes either ($port = 5) = 3; or $port = 3; Ternary operator would be high on my list of things not to allow if I were writing computer language style guides - I can say this as I learnt Fortran. Fortran didn't have many features as a language and we still use to condemn this one!!!! Consider the most readable solution, if/else is usually quite readable ;) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: Encryption...is a powerful defensive weapon for free people. iD8DBQE/zlKbGFXfHI9FVgYRAn2dAKCb6vXjjfI2azAIijEBqEFY+BLscQCffqAh 0WdQuLioCwvxLjQ0D8cDz/I= =n1Zc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Thu Dec 4 02:51:52 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: Little syntax query In-Reply-To: <200312032116.13566.simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> References: <200312031952.30148.linux@codehelp.co.uk> <200312032116.13566.simon@wretched.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031204085152.GA30893@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Simon Waters wrote: > Ternary operator would be high on my list of things not to allow if I were > writing computer language style guides I love them, and I nest them, so sue me :) Steve From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 8 04:16:13 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time Message-ID: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> In order to set a time, it'd be nice to know which train people are getting in and getting back. Any ideas? Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 8 04:24:51 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time In-Reply-To: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 December 2003 10:16, Steve Marvell wrote: > In order to set a time, it'd be nice to know which train people are > getting in and getting back. > > Any ideas? > Just phoned rail enquiries. There's no choice: train arrives Barnstaple at 19:14 for me. Unbelievably, it is a two hour trip. - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/1FFzy5o0lRFL2ooRAlL2AKDcK8psPD4XhdFzadV2zmjz+5cQuACeIOqp zmFVKmL+ch0ObmhK9H51jQg= =YKZK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 8 04:49:46 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time In-Reply-To: References: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031208104946.GA6568@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > Just phoned rail enquiries. There's no choice: train arrives > Barnstaple at 19:14 for me. When do you have to go back? > Unbelievably, it is a two hour trip. Jinkies. Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 8 04:43:39 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time In-Reply-To: <20031208104946.GA6568@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <20031208104946.GA6568@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 December 2003 10:49, Steve Marvell wrote: > Matthew Browning wrote: > > Just phoned rail enquiries. There's no choice: train arrives > > Barnstaple at 19:14 for me. > > When do you have to go back? > 21:48 - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/1FXby5o0lRFL2ooRAqObAKDcExKnF+FcPqCInbWeT84Jyhe2+gCgz3Sc GqbP2v1ZboYm+1l0LemjtFM= =g3Nu -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Mon Dec 8 04:59:57 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time In-Reply-To: References: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <20031208104946.GA6568@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031208105957.GA6619@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > > > Just phoned rail enquiries. There's no choice: train arrives > > > Barnstaple at 19:14 for me. > > > > When do you have to go back? > > 21:48 With 10 minutes in and out of town, that's two hours of meeting for four hours of travel. Bummer Steve From mb at matthewb.org Mon Dec 8 04:59:57 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:52 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting time In-Reply-To: <20031208105957.GA6619@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031208101613.GA6089@flumpet.demon.co.uk> <20031208105957.GA6619@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 08 December 2003 10:59, Steve Marvell wrote: > Matthew Browning wrote: > > > > Just phoned rail enquiries. There's no choice: train arrives > > > > Barnstaple at 19:14 for me. > > > > > > When do you have to go back? > > > > 21:48 > > With 10 minutes in and out of town, that's two hours of meeting for > four hours of travel. > I'm personally not bothered. I'm sure it will be two hours quality time ;) - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/1Fmty5o0lRFL2ooRAiaXAJwOg3lmSRauMTmzl5EN+3GWwlJMYgCg5i6F 1czvvr5UJ4EWV/RjhxK+9Rk= =SqwQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Fri Dec 12 06:28:20 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:53 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting reminder Message-ID: <20031212122820.GA18185@flumpet.demon.co.uk> It was yesterday and the two of us had a great time. Steve From steve at devon-it.co.uk Fri Dec 12 06:30:46 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:53 2004 Subject: DCPM: bad dups Message-ID: <20031212123046.GA18209@flumpet.demon.co.uk> The main body of the problemw ill follow with the solution, but I wonder about the following scenario: Two entries are duplicates becase, other than port and db being the same, the IP and canonical name are one in each one. Obviously, you want to delete the IP one from the DB, so there is another stage before being able to generate the list. Can you see any other foibles? Steve From mb at matthewb.org Fri Dec 12 09:52:19 2003 From: mb at matthewb.org (Matthew Browning) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:53 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting reminder In-Reply-To: <20031212122820.GA18185@flumpet.demon.co.uk> References: <20031212122820.GA18185@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Friday 12 December 2003 12:28, Steve Marvell wrote: > It was yesterday and the two of us had a great time. > Hmm. I was coming but I presumed it had been cancelled due to apathy since no one had confirmed they were coming or arranged a time. I was reluctant to press the issue for fear of forcing people into it. O well. I don't understand the `bad dups' question that follows this thread. - -- http://matthewb.org/public_key.txt -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/2eQ0y5o0lRFL2ooRAmbJAJ4s1sS8dS8b1LeamDNOmlb8cmT8VQCfQiZq mot2hGJdx4gnOxmZjlPzcVU= =mMm2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From steve at devon-it.co.uk Fri Dec 12 11:04:59 2003 From: steve at devon-it.co.uk (Steve Marvell) Date: Thu Aug 5 00:28:53 2004 Subject: DCPM: meeting reminder In-Reply-To: References: <20031212122820.GA18185@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Message-ID: <20031212170459.GB18986@flumpet.demon.co.uk> Matthew Browning wrote: > I don't understand the `bad dups' question that follows this thread. You should have come to the meeting then! Steve